SHO, Kudiyanmala Police Station vs Ranjith Thaliyil Advocate - SAJEEVAN T P — 657/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section u/s.126(2),115(2),296(b). Status: For framing of charge. Next hearing: 29th July 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: KLKN010049622025
Next Hearing
29th July 2026
Filing Number
21674/2025
Filing Date
15-12-2025
Registration No
657/2025
Registration Date
16-12-2025
Court
District Court and Sessions Court / Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thalassery
Judge
2-1st Additional District Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
683
Police Station
Kudiyanmala Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHO (Station House Officer), Kudiyanmala Police Station
Adv. SHYMA T.K(Spl. Public Prosecutor)
Respondent(s)
Ranjith Thaliyil Advocate - SAJEEVAN T P
Hearing History
Judge: 2-1st Additional District Judge
For framing of charge
For appearance of the accused
call on
remand Extended
For framing charge
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-05-2026 | For framing of charge |
| 16-03-2026 | For appearance of the accused |
| 07-03-2026 | call on |
| 03-03-2026 | remand Extended |
| 17-02-2026 | For framing charge |
Interim Orders
Case Summary - SC 657/2025 Ranjith T was granted bail on February 9, 2026, after spending six months in judicial custody on charges of wrongful restraint, voluntarily causing hurt, and cruelty against his wife and daughter under the BNS 2023 and Juvenile Justice Act 2015. The court imposed strict conditions: ₹50,000 bail bond with two sureties, prohibition from entering the victims' residence until trial conclusion, and no involvement in further crimes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary - SC 657/2025 Ranjith T was granted bail on February 9, 2026, after spending six months in judicial custody on charges of wrongful restraint, voluntarily causing hurt, and cruelty against his wife and daughter under the BNS 2023 and Juvenile Justice Act 2015. The court imposed strict conditions: ₹50,000 bail bond with two sureties, prohibition from entering the victims' residence until trial conclusion, and no involvement in further crimes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts