Nadukkandi Meethal Leela vs Kovilodi Mini Advocate - M.P. Sukumaran and M. Bindu — 114/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26 Ord.7, Rule 1. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLKK210002652021

Filing Number

235/2021

Filing Date

06-Aug-2021

Registration No

114/2021

Registration Date

17-Aug-2021

Court

Munsiff Court,Koyilandy

Judge

1-Munsiff/Jfcm-2

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECREED

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26 Ord.7, Rule 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nadukkandi Meethal Leela

    Adv. T. Harteesh Kumar

  2. 2.Balakrishnan Nair

  3. 3.Radha

  4. 4.Asokan

  5. 5.Santha

  6. 6.Suresh Kumar

  7. 7.Narayanikutti Amma

  8. 8.Sunil Kumar

  9. 9.Anil Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kovilodi Mini Advocate - M.P. Sukumaran and M. Bindu

  2. 2.Remya Raj

    Adv. M.P. Sukumaran and M. Bindu

  3. 3.Reshma Raj

    Adv. M.P. Sukumaran and M. Bindu

  4. 4.Ganga Raj

    Adv. M.P. Sukumaran and M. Bindu

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case 114/2021 Summary Court Decision: The Munsiff court decreed the partition suit, ordering that two properties be divided equally among all parties—each of the six individual plaintiffs receives 1/8 share; plaintiffs 7-9 jointly receive 1/8 share; and defendants 1-4 jointly receive 1/8 share. The court rejected the defendants' counter-claim for additional property rights based on alleged oral agreements and unproven monetary contributions. Key Reasoning: The court found that defendants failed to substantiate their claims that a deceased family member agreed to transfer additional property to them in exchange for construction expenses or gold ornaments. The defendants could not prove an oral agreement to transfer the gifted 5-cent property without written evidence or satisfactory proof, and mediation settlement claims lacked documentary support. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  4. 28-Mar-2026

    Order/ Judgement

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    For Hearing

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    for evidence

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    For Further Defence Evidence

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  8. 23-Mar-2026

    For Defendent Evidence

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  9. 19-Mar-2026

    for evidence

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  10. 17-Mar-2026

    Further evidence

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  11. 16-Mar-2026

    for evidence

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  12. 23-Jan-2026

    Listed to

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  13. 20-Jan-2026

    Steps if any

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  14. 13-Jan-2026

    For Steps

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  15. 08-Dec-2025

    Steps if any

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  16. 02-Dec-2025

    For Steps

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  17. 22-Nov-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  18. 03-Nov-2025

    Verify and report

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  19. 21-Oct-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  20. 08-Oct-2025

    Verify and report

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  21. 27-Sep-2025

    For additional written statement

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  22. 09-Sep-2025

    For additional written statement

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  23. 22-Aug-2025

    Written Statement

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  24. 02-Aug-2025

    For Steps

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  25. 23-Jul-2025

    OrderView PDF

  26. 23-Jul-2025

    OrderView PDF

  27. 23-Jul-2025

    For Carry Out Amendment

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  28. 14-Jul-2025

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  29. 05-Jul-2025

    For Counter in IA

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  30. 24-Jun-2025

    For Steps

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  31. 09-Jun-2025

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  32. 28-May-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  33. 05-Apr-2025

    For Hearing

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  34. 10-Mar-2025

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  35. 18-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  36. 05-Feb-2025

    For Steps

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  37. 13-Dec-2024

    Written Statement

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  38. 30-Nov-2024

    Orders in IA

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  39. 11-Nov-2024

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  40. 24-Oct-2024

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  41. 16-Oct-2024

    For Counter in IA

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  42. 07-Oct-2024

    for evidence

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  43. 04-Oct-2024

    For Counter in IA

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  44. 27-Aug-2024

    Listed to

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  45. 25-Jul-2024

    For Steps

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  46. 15-Jul-2024

    For Steps

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  47. 12-Jun-2024

    For Steps

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  48. 21-May-2024

    For Carry Out Amendment

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  49. 09-Apr-2024

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  50. 23-Feb-2024

    For hearing on IA

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  51. 11-Dec-2023

    For Counter

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  52. 21-Oct-2023

    For Counter

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  53. 16-Aug-2023

    For Steps

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  54. 06-Jul-2023

    Issues

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  55. 17-Mar-2023

    Issues

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  56. 23-Jan-2023

    Issues

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  57. 02-Dec-2022

    Await report

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  58. 24-Nov-2022

    For reports

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  59. 03-Nov-2022

    Call on

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  60. 19-Sep-2022

    Call on

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  61. 02-Aug-2022

    Call on

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  62. 14-Jun-2022

    Call on

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  63. 17-Mar-2022

    Written Statement

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  64. 24-Jan-2022

    Written Statement

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  65. 25-Nov-2021

    Written Statement

    Munsiff/Jfcm-2

  66. 30-Sep-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  67. 06-Aug-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 114/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case 114/2021 Summary Court Decision: The Munsiff court decreed the partition suit, ordering that two properties be divided equally among all parties—each of the six individual plaintiffs receives 1/8 share; plaintiffs 7-9 jointly receive 1/8 share; and defendants 1-4 jointly receive 1/8 share. The court rejected the defendants' counter-claim for additional property rights based on alleged oral agreements and unproven monetary contributions. Key Reasoning: The court found that defendants failed to substantiate their claims that a deceased family member agreed to transfer additional property to them in exchange for construction expenses or gold ornaments. The defendants could not prove an oral agreement to transfer the gifted 5-cent property without written evidence or satisfactory proof, and mediation settlement claims lacked documentary support. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case