V C JOY vs K V FRANCIS Advocate - DILEEPAN M K, S KARTHIK MENON, S KARTHIK MENONTOMMY LOUIS, — 50/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SEC.26, ORDER 7 R.1 CPC. Status: Report on mediation. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLER410001492025
Next Hearing
04th July 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
178/2025
Filing Date
30-07-2025
Registration No
50/2025
Registration Date
01-08-2025
Court
Sub Court, Perumbavoor
Judge
1-Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
V C JOY
Adv. KRISHNA KUMAR R
Respondent(s)
K V FRANCIS Advocate - DILEEPAN M K, S KARTHIK MENON, S KARTHIK MENONTOMMY LOUIS,
FELVIN
Adv. DILEEPAN M K,S KARTHIK MENON TOMMY LOUIS
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge/Assistant Sessions Judge,Perumbavoor
Report on mediation
Call on
For production of documents/Affidavit
For hearing on IA
Call with IA
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Report on mediation | |
| 13-03-2026 | Call on | |
| 09-03-2026 | For production of documents/Affidavit | |
| 03-03-2026 | For hearing on IA | |
| 26-02-2026 | Call with IA |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Perumbavoor granted an ad interim order on August 2, 2025, directing respondents K.V. Francis and Felvin to furnish security of Rs. 59,52,772 or show cause why security should not be furnished. The court conditionally attached the petition schedule property to the extent of Rs. 59,52,772, finding that the respondents intended to alienate property to defeat execution of a potential decree. Notice was issued to respondents with return of notice on September 8, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Order
Case Summary: The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Perumbavoor granted an ad interim order on August 2, 2025, directing respondents K.V. Francis and Felvin to furnish security of Rs. 59,52,772 or show cause why security should not be furnished. The court conditionally attached the petition schedule property to the extent of Rs. 59,52,772, finding that the respondents intended to alienate property to defeat execution of a potential decree. Notice was issued to respondents with return of notice on September 8, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts