Malankara Marthomma Syrian Church its Rep by Sabha Secretary and C E O Rev Father Abey T Mammen vs Aluva Settlements its Rep by Manager — 300067/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section S26O7R1. Status: For Hearing. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLER320002632025
e-Filing Number
12-05-2025
Filing Number
300297/2025
Filing Date
27-May-2025
Registration No
300067/2025
Registration Date
28-May-2025
Court
Sub Court, North Paravur
Judge
1-Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur
Last updated 27-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Malankara Marthomma Syrian Church its Rep by Sabha Secretary and C E O Rev Father Abey T Mammen
Respondent(s)
-
1.Aluva Settlements its Rep by Manager
Case History
-
01-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
26-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur
-
07-Mar-2026
For hearing on IA
Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur
-
25-Feb-2026
Verify and report
Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur
-
11-Feb-2026
For hearing on IA
Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur
-
07-Jan-2026
For hearing on IA
Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur
-
04-Dec-2025
OrderView PDF
Summary The Court of Principal Sub Judge, North Paravur dismissed the temporary injunction petition (IA No. 1/2025) filed by Malankara Marthoma Syrian Church against Aluva Settlement on December 4, 2025. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case regarding alleged boundary destruction and encroachment of 4 cents of land, as the Advocate Commissioner's report did not support the encroachment claims. The petition was dismissed with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Dec-2025
For settlement
Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur
-
24-Nov-2025
Order/ Judgement
Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur
-
13-Nov-2025
Orders in IA
Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur
-
01-Nov-2025
Orders in IA
Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur
-
21-Oct-2025
Call on
Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur
-
16-Oct-2025
Order/ Judgement
Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur
-
10-Oct-2025
Order/ Judgement
Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur
-
30-Sep-2025
Order/Judgement
Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur
-
22-Sep-2025
Orders in IA
Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur
-
16-Sep-2025
Orders in IA
Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur
-
09-Sep-2025
Orders in IA
Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur
-
23-Aug-2025
For hearing on IA
Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur
-
19-Aug-2025
Call on
Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur
-
16-Aug-2025
For Counter
Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur
-
05-Aug-2025
Verify and report
Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur
-
02-Aug-2025
For further hearing
Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur
-
29-Jul-2025
For further hearing
Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur
-
25-Jul-2025
For Hearing
Principal Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur
-
15-Jul-2025
OrderView PDF
-
15-Jul-2025
Appearance Of Parties
Additional Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur
-
20-Jun-2025
Call with IA
Additional Sub Judge And Asst Sessions Judge, North Paravur
-
16-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 300067/2025
Summary The Court of Principal Sub Judge, North Paravur dismissed the temporary injunction petition (IA No. 1/2025) filed by Malankara Marthoma Syrian Church against Aluva Settlement on December 4, 2025. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case regarding alleged boundary destruction and encroachment of 4 cents of land, as the Advocate Commissioner's report did not support the encroachment claims. The petition was dismissed with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts