Malankara Marthomma Syrian Church its Rep by Sabha Secretary and C E O Rev Father Abey T Mammen vs Aluva Settlements its Rep by Manager — 300067/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section S26O7R1. Status: FOR HEARING. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLER320002632025
Next Hearing
01st April 2026
e-Filing Number
12-05-2025
Filing Number
300297/2025
Filing Date
27-05-2025
Registration No
300067/2025
Registration Date
28-05-2025
Court
Sub Court, North Paravur
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SUB JUDGE AND ASST SESSIONS JUDGE, North Paravur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Malankara Marthomma Syrian Church its Rep by Sabha Secretary and C E O Rev Father Abey T Mammen
Respondent(s)
Aluva Settlements its Rep by Manager
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SUB JUDGE AND ASST SESSIONS JUDGE, North Paravur
FOR HEARING
For hearing on IA
Verify and report
For hearing on IA
For hearing on IA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 26-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 07-03-2026 | For hearing on IA |
| 25-02-2026 | Verify and report |
| 11-02-2026 | For hearing on IA |
| 07-01-2026 | For hearing on IA |
Interim Orders
Summary The Court of Principal Sub Judge, North Paravur dismissed the temporary injunction petition (IA No. 1/2025) filed by Malankara Marthoma Syrian Church against Aluva Settlement on December 4, 2025. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case regarding alleged boundary destruction and encroachment of 4 cents of land, as the Advocate Commissioner's report did not support the encroachment claims. The petition was dismissed with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Court of Principal Sub Judge, North Paravur dismissed the temporary injunction petition (IA No. 1/2025) filed by Malankara Marthoma Syrian Church against Aluva Settlement on December 4, 2025. The court found that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case regarding alleged boundary destruction and encroachment of 4 cents of land, as the Advocate Commissioner's report did not support the encroachment claims. The petition was dismissed with costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts