Abdul Rahim vs Subaida Beevi Advocate - RAMANATHAN T R, RAMANATHAN T R — 11/2025

Case under Buildings (lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 (kerala) Section Section 18. Status: For L C R. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.

RCA - CIVIL APPEAL (RENT CONTROL)

CNR: KLER300009252025

For L C R

Next Hearing

10th July 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

208/2025

Filing Date

27-10-2025

Registration No

11/2025

Registration Date

28-10-2025

Court

Addl. District Court, North Paravur/Rent Control Appellate Authority

Judge

1-ADDL DIST. AND SESSIONS JUDGE-1, North Paravur

Acts & Sections

Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 (Kerala) Section Section 18
IA/1/2025 Classification : Application For Stay During Pendency Of Appeal Section Abdul RahimSubaida Beevi
IA/2/2025 Classification : Delay Condonation Application Section Abdul RahimSubaida Beevi

Petitioner(s)

Abdul Rahim

Adv. NASARUDHEEN K M

Respondent(s)

Subaida Beevi Advocate - RAMANATHAN T R, RAMANATHAN T R

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDL DIST. AND SESSIONS JUDGE-1, North Paravur

10-03-2026

For L C R

12-02-2026

Return of notice

12-11-2025

Return of notice

11-11-2025

For Counter

10-11-2025

For Objection and hearing

Interim Orders

12-11-2025
Order
12-11-2025
Order

Summary: The petition filed by Out Look Mens Wear to condone a 107-day delay in filing a rent control appeal was allowed conditionally. Although the court found the reasons for delay (father's illness preventing contact with lawyer) were not substantiated by evidence, it granted the petitioner a further opportunity to contest the appeal on the condition that the petitioner pay costs of Rs. 2,000 to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition filed by Out Look Mens Wear to condone a 107-day delay in filing a rent control appeal was allowed conditionally. Although the court found the reasons for delay (father's illness preventing contact with lawyer) were not substantiated by evidence, it granted the petitioner a further opportunity to contest the appeal on the condition that the petitioner pay costs of Rs. 2,000 to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Addl. District Court, North Paravur/Rent Control Appellate Authority All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case