Rafeek P K vs Antony Joseph Advocate - VINOD M M — 585/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26 section 7 order 1 rule. Status: For hearing on IA. Next hearing: 19th May 2026.

OS - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KLAL110012232025

For hearing on IA

Next Hearing

19th May 2026

Filing Number

1112/2025

Filing Date

21-11-2025

Registration No

585/2025

Registration Date

21-11-2025

Court

Munsiff Court, Cherthala

Judge

1-Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

Acts & Sections

Civil Procedure Code Section 26 section 7 order 1 rule
IA/1/2025 Classification : Injunction Application Section Rafeek P KAntony Joseph
IA/2/2025 Classification : Commission Application Section Rafeek P KAntony Joseph
IA/3/2025 Classification : Petition To Accept Photocopy Section Rafeek P KAntony Joseph
IA/1/2026 Classification : Advance Application Section Rafeek P KAntony Joseph
IA/2/2026 Classification : Injunction Application Section Rafeek P KAntony Joseph

Petitioner(s)

Rafeek P K

Adv. JOY VARGHESE

Raisa

Adv. JOY VARGHESE

Respondent(s)

Antony Joseph Advocate - VINOD M M

George Joseph

Adv. JOSE P JOSEPH

Joy Joseph

Adv. JOSE P JOSEPH

Joby Joseph

Adv. VINOD M M

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal Munsiff. Cherthala

10-04-2026

For hearing on IA

08-04-2026

Verify and report

26-03-2026

For Arguments

25-03-2026

FOR HEARING

23-03-2026

For hearing on IA

Interim Orders

10-04-2026
Order

Summary: In this rent dispute case (O.S. No.585/2025), the Principal Munsiff of Cherthala court ordered that parties maintain status quo until disposal of interim applications (IAs). The court noted that plaintiffs Rafeek P.K and Raisa have paid rent arrears of Rs. 1.5 lakhs and rent advance of Rs. 6 lakhs, and found no valid reason for eviction, thereby protecting the plaintiffs' tenancy rights pending further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In this rent dispute case (O.S. No.585/2025), the Principal Munsiff of Cherthala court ordered that parties maintain status quo until disposal of interim applications (IAs). The court noted that plaintiffs Rafeek P.K and Raisa have paid rent arrears of Rs. 1.5 lakhs and rent advance of Rs. 6 lakhs, and found no valid reason for eviction, thereby protecting the plaintiffs' tenancy rights pending further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Munsiff Court, Cherthala All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case