Arun Mohan vs Jayakrishnan A.G. Advocate - KEERTHANA S — 66/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED IN TERMS OF COMPROMISE. on 01st June 2026.
OS - ORIGINAL SUIT
CNR: KLAL100003032025
Filing Number
218/2025
Filing Date
20-12-2025
Registration No
66/2025
Registration Date
20-12-2025
Court
Sub Court, Cherthala
Judge
1-Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala
Decision Date
01st June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED IN TERMS OF COMPROMISE.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Arun Mohan
Adv. SAJEEVAN P K
Respondent(s)
Jayakrishnan A.G. Advocate - KEERTHANA S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Sub Judge and Asst.Sessions Judge, Cherthala
Disposed
FOR HEARING
Judge on traing programme
Report on mediation
Report from FSL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-05-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 16-03-2026 | Judge on traing programme |
| 23-02-2026 | Report on mediation |
| 21-01-2026 | Report from FSL |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 66/2025 Summary The Cherthala Sub Judge Court decreed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction filed by Arun Mohan against Jayakrishnan A.G. based on an amicable settlement reached through court-referred mediation. The court accepted the mediation agreement, whereby the defendant returned vacant possession of the property with building keys, consented to the plaintiff removing kitchen equipment and furniture for his venture, and refunded ₹10,00,000 as security. The plaintiff was awarded full court fee refund, and both parties bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 66/2025 Summary The Cherthala Sub Judge Court decreed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction filed by Arun Mohan against Jayakrishnan A.G. based on an amicable settlement reached through court-referred mediation. The court accepted the mediation agreement, whereby the defendant returned vacant possession of the property with building keys, consented to the plaintiff removing kitchen equipment and furniture for his venture, and refunded ₹10,00,000 as security. The plaintiff was awarded full court fee refund, and both parties bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts