P-1. Chandrashekhar S/o Bhimashappa Baddepalli vs D-1. MD. Haneef S/o Nabisab Badeghar — 64/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7Rule1ofcpc. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAYG020009222023
Filing Number
64/2023
Filing Date
21-Apr-2023
Registration No
64/2023
Registration Date
21-Apr-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, YADGIR
Judge
333-Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM, Yadgir
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.P-1. Chandrashekhar S/o Bhimashappa Baddepalli
Adv. M.M.KANTIMANI
-
2.P-2. Hanamanta S/o Bhimashappa Baddepalli
-
3.P-3. Neelamma W/o Sanjeeva Baddepalli
Respondent(s)
-
1.D-1. MD. Haneef S/o Nabisab Badeghar
-
2.D-2. Ladesab S/o Magudmali Badeghar
-
3.D-3. Makabul S/o Magudma Ali Badeghar
-
4.D-4. Nabisab S/o Magudma Ali Badeghar
-
5.D-5. Ashraf Ali S/o Magudma Ali Badeghar
-
6.D-1(a) Moulamma W/o Late MD Hanif Badagera
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
-
14-Mar-2026
DecreeView PDF
Case Summary: OS 64/2023 The Senior Civil Judge at Yadgiri approved a compromise decree resolving a land dispute between agricultural neighbors in Duppalli village. The plaintiffs and defendants agreed that the plaintiffs own survey plots 265 (1 acre 24 guntas), 266 (28 guntas), and portion of 452/1 (2 acres 20 guntas), while defendants own the remaining portion of 452/1 (8 acres 18 guntas). Both parties acknowledged the original 1973 sale deed incorrectly listed 8 acres instead of the actual amount. Each party agreed not to interfere with the other's possession, and both were permitted to update their names in land records through mutation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM, Yadgir
-
13-Mar-2026
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM, Yadgir
-
23-Feb-2026
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM, Yadgir
-
02-Feb-2026
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM, Yadgir
-
09-Jan-2026
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM, Yadgir
-
06-Dec-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM, Yadgir
-
11-Nov-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM, Yadgir
-
17-Oct-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM, Yadgir
-
20-Sep-2025
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM, Yadgir
-
29-Aug-2025
For Amended Plaint
Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM, Yadgir
-
12-Aug-2025
For Amended Plaint
Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM, Yadgir
-
30-Jul-2025
For Amended Plaint
Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM, Yadgir
-
23-Jun-2025
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM, Yadgir
-
07-Apr-2025
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM, Yadgir
-
18-Mar-2025
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM, Yadgir
-
17-Feb-2025
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM, Yadgir
-
07-Jan-2025
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM, Yadgir
-
11-Nov-2024
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM, Yadgir
-
15-Oct-2024
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM, Yadgir
-
17-Sep-2024
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM, Yadgir
-
21-Aug-2024
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM, Yadgir
-
21-Jun-2024
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM, Yadgir
-
15-Apr-2024
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM, Yadgir
-
12-Apr-2024
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM, Yadgir
-
30-Jan-2024
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM, Yadgir
-
11-Sep-2023
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM, Yadgir
-
01-Aug-2023
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM, Yadgir
-
11-Jul-2023
Appearance Of Party
Senior CIVIL Judge And CJM, Yadgir
-
21-Apr-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Apr-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 64/2023
Case Summary: OS 64/2023 The Senior Civil Judge at Yadgiri approved a compromise decree resolving a land dispute between agricultural neighbors in Duppalli village. The plaintiffs and defendants agreed that the plaintiffs own survey plots 265 (1 acre 24 guntas), 266 (28 guntas), and portion of 452/1 (2 acres 20 guntas), while defendants own the remaining portion of 452/1 (8 acres 18 guntas). Both parties acknowledged the original 1973 sale deed incorrectly listed 8 acres instead of the actual amount. Each party agreed not to interfere with the other's possession, and both were permitted to update their names in land records through mutation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts