Smt. G. B. Siddamma vs Smt. Shavamma — 244/2016

Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc Section 26. Status: EVIDENCE ON DEFENCE(CR). Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

O.S. - ORIGINAL SUIT

CNR: KAVN510015082016

EVIDENCE ON DEFENCE(CR)

Next Hearing

16th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

244/2016

Filing Date

07-12-2016

Registration No

244/2016

Registration Date

07-12-2016

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARAPANAHALLI

Judge

254-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARAPANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT

Acts & Sections

U/O 7 RULE 1 and 2 of CPC Section 26

Petitioner(s)

Smt. G. B. Siddamma

Adv. RAMANAGOUDA PATIL

Avina Kotresh

Respondent(s)

Smt. Shavamma

Smt. Sharanamma

T. Karibasavaraja

Rajappa

Hearing History

Judge: 254-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HARAPANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT

01-04-2026

EVIDENCE ON DEFENCE(CR)

07-03-2026

EVIDENCE ON DEFENCE(CR)

05-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

26-02-2026

For CLARIFICATION

08-01-2026

EVIDENCE ON DEFENCE(CR)

Interim Orders

03-09-2018
Orders
02-11-2020
Issue
16-09-2021
Deposition
29-09-2021
Deposition
27-06-2024
Deposition
19-09-2024
Deposition
13-02-2025
Deposition
03-07-2025
Deposition
12-09-2025
Deposition
24-09-2025
Deposition
05-12-2025
Deposition
01-04-2026
Deposition

Summary OS No.244/2016 - Witness Examination Order (01-04-2026) The witness (DW-1) was examined on 01-04-2026 and gave sworn testimony regarding a property dispute. The court found the witness's testimony to be largely unreliable and contradictory, particularly regarding claims about property ownership and transactions involving the third defendant. The examination was completed and the case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary OS No.244/2016 - Witness Examination Order (01-04-2026) The witness (DW-1) was examined on 01-04-2026 and gave sworn testimony regarding a property dispute. The court found the witness's testimony to be largely unreliable and contradictory, particularly regarding claims about property ownership and transactions involving the third defendant. The examination was completed and the case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HARAPANAHALLI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case