K.Halappa, Since dead by his LRs,(Legal Heir) vs K.Channabasappa, Since dead by his LRs, — 21/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order,21,Rule,11,. Status: FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
EX - Execution Petition Under Order
CNR: KAVN310009442018
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
21/2018
Filing Date
06-04-2018
Registration No
21/2018
Registration Date
06-04-2018
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI
Judge
1213-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K.Halappa, Since dead by his LRs,(Legal Heir)
Respondent(s)
K.Channabasappa, Since dead by his LRs,
Hearing History
Judge: 1213-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C
FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C
FOR OBJECTION/COUNTER TO MAIN PETITION(CR)
SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR)
AWAITING FOR RECORDS/AWAITING FOR ORDERS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C | |
| 28-03-2026 | FIRST HEARING/MAINTAINABILITY-C | |
| 07-03-2026 | FOR OBJECTION/COUNTER TO MAIN PETITION(CR) | |
| 31-01-2026 | SUMMONS/WARRANT TO THE ACCUSED/NOTICE(CR) | |
| 29-11-2025 | AWAITING FOR RECORDS/AWAITING FOR ORDERS |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: EP.No.21/2018 | Senior Civil Judge, Huvinahadagali | 12 September 2025 Outcome: The court dismissed IA No.43 (application to implead additional respondents) with costs of Rs.3,000 for causing unnecessary delay. The court found that the proposed respondents (Ganesh Itagi and Thirukana Gowda) are not necessary parties to the objectors' third-party claims, which must first be decided on their own merits under IA No.16 before involving subsequent purchasers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: EP.No.21/2018 | Senior Civil Judge, Huvinahadagali | 12 September 2025 Outcome: The court dismissed IA No.43 (application to implead additional respondents) with costs of Rs.3,000 for causing unnecessary delay. The court found that the proposed respondents (Ganesh Itagi and Thirukana Gowda) are not necessary parties to the objectors' third-party claims, which must first be decided on their own merits under IA No.16 before involving subsequent purchasers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts