J S Shanmukhappa S/o Late Smt. Siddalingamma and Late Adiveppa vs B Maheshappa S/o Smt. Saneeravva alias Sannerakka and late Chikrappa — 36/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule,7,1and2,RW,Sec,151. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 11th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAVN200003652018
Filing Number
36/2018
Filing Date
25-04-2018
Registration No
36/2018
Registration Date
25-04-2018
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KUDLIGI
Judge
174-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KUDLIGI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
J S Shanmukhappa S/o Late Smt. Siddalingamma and Late Adiveppa
Adv. T A Saleem
Respondent(s)
B Maheshappa S/o Smt. Saneeravva alias Sannerakka and late Chikrappa
Channabasappa S/o late Smt. Siddamma
Hearing History
Judge: 174-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC KUDLIGI VIJAYANAGARA DISTRICT
Disposed
JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | JUDGMENT/FINAL ORDER |
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 05-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 25-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Senior Civil Judge of Kudligi decreed the plaintiff's partition suit, holding that he is a legitimate grandson of deceased Bethooru Kariyappa through his mother Siddalingamma and is entitled to a 1/3rd share of the joint family properties. The court rejected the defendants' claim that the plaintiff was unrelated to the family, finding that the defendants failed to provide any evidence supporting their contentions or proving execution of any gift deed during Bethooru Kariyappa's lifetime. Consequently, the plaintiff and defendants No.1 and No.2 are each entitled to an equal 1/3rd share of the suit schedule 'B' properties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Senior Civil Judge of Kudligi decreed the plaintiff's partition suit, holding that he is a legitimate grandson of deceased Bethooru Kariyappa through his mother Siddalingamma and is entitled to a 1/3rd share of the joint family properties. The court rejected the defendants' claim that the plaintiff was unrelated to the family, finding that the defendants failed to provide any evidence supporting their contentions or proving execution of any gift deed during Bethooru Kariyappa's lifetime. Consequently, the plaintiff and defendants No.1 and No.2 are each entitled to an equal 1/3rd share of the suit schedule 'B' properties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts