Vilasini J. Shetty vs Nagappa Ganiga Advocate - Harish M.M. — 364/2015
Case under Section U/S26,OVII,R1ofCPC,1908,U/S26,OVII,R1ofCPC,1908. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUP320022692015
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
364/2015
Filing Date
25-11-2015
Registration No
364/2015
Registration Date
26-11-2015
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA
Judge
516-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vilasini J. Shetty
Adv. Malyady Jayarama Shetty
Hemanthpal Shetty, 37 Years
Adv. Malyady Jayarama Shetty
Respondent(s)
Nagappa Ganiga Advocate - Harish M.M.
Krishna Ganiga, 50 Years
Rama Ganiga, 48 Years
Lakshman Ganiga, 46 Years
Adv. Harish M.M.
Smt. Sulochana Ganiga, 46 Years
Adv. Harish M.M.
Smt. Leelavathi, 44 Years
Smt. Rajeevi, 36 Years
Adv. Harish M.M.
Hearing History
Judge: 516-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 04-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 08-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 04-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 19-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary In OS No. 364/2015 before the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Kundapura, the court hearing on 13-08-2025 recorded witness examination and continued the main trial. The defendant's counsel presented four documentary exhibits (survey records from 2022-2023 and 2000-2001, FMB extract, and field sketch) relating to property in Senapur village. The plaintiff's counsel was granted time to file a written reply to the documents presented, and the case has been adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary In OS No. 364/2015 before the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Kundapura, the court hearing on 13-08-2025 recorded witness examination and continued the main trial. The defendant's counsel presented four documentary exhibits (survey records from 2022-2023 and 2000-2001, FMB extract, and field sketch) relating to property in Senapur village. The plaintiff's counsel was granted time to file a written reply to the documents presented, and the case has been adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts