BARDC Bank Bhatkal Gokarna Branch vs Rajesh Shantaram Naik — 165/2022
Case under U/o. Xxi Rule 11 of Cpc. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED on 06th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK720005132022
Filing Number
165/2022
Filing Date
14-07-2022
Registration No
165/2022
Registration Date
14-07-2022
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUMTA
Judge
904-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KUMTA
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--CONVICTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BARDC Bank Bhatkal Gokarna Branch
Adv. K R Naik
Respondent(s)
Rajesh Shantaram Naik
Hearing History
Judge: 904-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KUMTA
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 03-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 28-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 26-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 20-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Summary The Senior Civil Judge convicted Rajesh Shantaram Naik under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque (No. 466066 for Rs. 2,65,000) that bounced due to insufficient funds on 18-12-2020, despite receiving legal notice to pay within 15 days. The court found that the accused, as guarantor for his mother's Rs. 10 lakh loan, had issued the cheque to discharge this legally recoverable debt and failed to pay after notice. Sentenced to pay Rs. 2,68,000 fine (including Rs. 2,65,000 compensation to the bank) or one year simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Summary The Senior Civil Judge convicted Rajesh Shantaram Naik under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque (No. 466066 for Rs. 2,65,000) that bounced due to insufficient funds on 18-12-2020, despite receiving legal notice to pay within 15 days. The court found that the accused, as guarantor for his mother's Rs. 10 lakh loan, had issued the cheque to discharge this legally recoverable debt and failed to pay after notice. Sentenced to pay Rs. 2,68,000 fine (including Rs. 2,65,000 compensation to the bank) or one year simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts