Prema Honappa Nayak vs Devanna Subray Nayak — 95/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 26,order7,Rule1. Status: ISSUES. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAUK210015122022

ISSUES

Next Hearing

16th April 2026

Filing Number

95/2022

Filing Date

14-10-2022

Registration No

95/2022

Registration Date

14-10-2022

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA

Judge

1334-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC ANKOLA

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 26,order7,Rule1

Petitioner(s)

Prema Honappa Nayak

Adv. VINOD VITTAL SHANBHAG

Shobha Promod Nayak

Rajamma Umesh Nayak

Respondent(s)

Devanna Subray Nayak

Narayan Bin Ramchandra Nayak

Hearing History

Judge: 1334-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC ANKOLA

06-03-2026

ISSUES

05-02-2026

ISSUES

09-01-2026

ISSUES

12-12-2025

ISSUES

08-12-2025

Steps

Interim Orders

02-03-2023
Issue
26-06-2024
Orders
21-10-2024
Orders
07-01-2025
Deposition
02-05-2025
Orders
04-09-2025
Orders

Summary: The court allowed an Interlocutory Application (IA No. III) filed by the proposed defendant seeking impleadment as Defendant No. 3 in a partition suit. The court found the proposed defendant to be a necessary party since he claims absolute ownership over certain suit properties (Sl. No. 4-6) based on an alleged Will executed in his favor by the deceased in 2016, and his presence is essential for effective determination of the partition dispute. The plaintiffs were directed to implead him as Defendant No. 3. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed an Interlocutory Application (IA No. III) filed by the proposed defendant seeking impleadment as Defendant No. 3 in a partition suit. The court found the proposed defendant to be a necessary party since he claims absolute ownership over certain suit properties (Sl. No. 4-6) based on an alleged Will executed in his favor by the deceased in 2016, and his presence is essential for effective determination of the partition dispute. The plaintiffs were directed to implead him as Defendant No. 3. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANKOLA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case