Shri. Ganesh Narayan Bandekar vs Vithal Narayan Bandekar — 3/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISED on 24th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK020004362026
Filing Number
3/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
3/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KARWAR
Judge
520-Prl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And CJM Court, Karwar
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMPROMISED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shri. Ganesh Narayan Bandekar
Adv. TODURKAR VINOD ANAND
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vithal Narayan Bandekar
-
2.Ullas Narayan Bandekar
-
3.Subash Koyar Mestri Alias Mistry Son of Mr. Koyar Waman Mestry
-
4.Shailesh Koyar Mestry
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
In O.S. No. 3/26, the court accepted a compromise petition filed by petitioner Shri. Ganesh Narayan Bandekar and respondents on 16-03-2026. The defendants admitted executing Special Powers of Attorney (SPAs) in favor of specified parties and acknowledged the compromise petition's contents. Finding the compromise lawful and in the parties' interest, the court disposed the suit per the compromise terms and directed a final decree accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And CJM Court, Karwar
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
Prl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And CJM Court, Karwar
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Prl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And CJM Court, Karwar
-
14-Mar-2026
Summons
Prl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And CJM Court, Karwar
-
13-Mar-2026
Lok-Adalath
Prl. Snr. CIVIL Judge And CJM Court, Karwar
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 3/2026
In O.S. No. 3/26, the court accepted a compromise petition filed by petitioner Shri. Ganesh Narayan Bandekar and respondents on 16-03-2026. The defendants admitted executing Special Powers of Attorney (SPAs) in favor of specified parties and acknowledged the compromise petition's contents. Finding the compromise lawful and in the parties' interest, the court disposed the suit per the compromise terms and directed a final decree accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts