Varalakshmi vs The Tahsildar, Registrar of Birth and Deaths — 48/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/Sec.13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK-ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
Crl. Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KARN420002892026
e-Filing Number
29-01-2026
Filing Number
48/2026
Filing Date
10-02-2026
Registration No
48/2026
Registration Date
10-02-2026
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI
Judge
887-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK-ADALAT
FIR Details
Police Station
MAGADI PS
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Varalakshmi
Adv. RAVI T M
Respondent(s)
The Tahsildar, Registrar of Birth and Deaths
Hearing History
Judge: 887-ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Disposed
CALL ON LOK ADALTH
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | CALL ON LOK ADALTH |
| 28-02-2026 | SUMMONS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 48/2026 (Varalakshmi v. Tahsildar, Registrar of Birth and Deaths) The National Lok Adalath allowed petitioner Varalakshmi's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, to register her daughter's date of birth as 25-11-2007 after verifying the supporting documents were satisfactory. The court directed the Registrar to enter this date in the register upon collection of prescribed fees, clarifying that this entry is not conclusive proof and can be disputed in future criminal proceedings, and is valid only for submission to the Registrar's office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 48/2026 (Varalakshmi v. Tahsildar, Registrar of Birth and Deaths) The National Lok Adalath allowed petitioner Varalakshmi's petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, to register her daughter's date of birth as 25-11-2007 after verifying the supporting documents were satisfactory. The court directed the Registrar to enter this date in the register upon collection of prescribed fees, clarifying that this entry is not conclusive proof and can be disputed in future criminal proceedings, and is valid only for submission to the Registrar's office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts