Rajamma vs Hanumanthappa — 679/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o 7 R 1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KARN410009422022

Filing Number

680/2022

Filing Date

15-Nov-2022

Registration No

679/2022

Registration Date

15-Nov-2022

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI

Judge

1029-Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o 7 R 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajamma

    Adv. N.N Sridhar

  2. 2.Siddagangamma

    Adv. N N SHRIDHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Hanumanthappa

  2. 2.Narasamma

  3. 3.Rajanna

  4. 4.Jayamma

  5. 5.Lokesh

  6. 6.Geetha

  7. 7.Byrappa

  8. 8.B. Latha

  9. 9.B Hemanth

  10. 10.Muniyappa

  11. 11.M. Swetha

  12. 12.M.Manjula

  13. 13.M. Kiran

  14. 14.Giriyappa

  15. 15.G. Mamatha

  16. 16.G. Swetha

  17. 17.G. Yashoda

  18. 18.G Kumari

  19. 19.M.D. Kowshik

  20. 20.N.C.Prakash

    Adv. CHITHRASHEKARAIAH H.A.

  21. 21.T.M Shobha

  22. 22.D20.N C Prakash

  23. 23.D21,T M Shobha

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: OS No. 679/2022 Court Decision: The Senior Civil Judge dismissed the plaintiffs' partition suit with costs. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish their claim to a share in the disputed property because their father Anjanappa himself executed the 2002 sale deed alienating the property, and a 2002 partition had already been conducted within the joint family. Key Reasoning: Under Hindu Succession law applicable pre-2004, daughters had limited rights in joint family property. Critically, since the father participated in executing the challenged sale deeds and a family partition occurred during his lifetime, the daughter-plaintiffs could not claim separate rights to the sold property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Judgments

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 28-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 22-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 06-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 03-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  13. 02-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  14. 12-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  15. 15-Sep-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  16. 15-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  17. 19-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  18. 20-Mar-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  19. 20-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  20. 20-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  21. 05-Nov-2024

    Summons

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  22. 23-Sep-2024

    Summons

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  23. 24-Jun-2024

    Summons

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  24. 15-Mar-2024

    Await Notice/Summons

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  25. 09-Jan-2024

    Summons

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  26. 11-Oct-2023

    Await Notice/Summons

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  27. 10-Aug-2023

    Summons

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  28. 08-Jun-2023

    Summons

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  29. 23-Mar-2023

    IssueView PDF

  30. 23-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  31. 03-Mar-2023

    Orders.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  32. 07-Feb-2023

    Await Notice/Summons

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  33. 31-Jan-2023

    Await Notice/Summons

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  34. 23-Nov-2022

    Summons

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  35. 22-Nov-2022

    Orders.

    Prl. Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  36. 15-Nov-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 15-Nov-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 679/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS No. 679/2022 Court Decision: The Senior Civil Judge dismissed the plaintiffs' partition suit with costs. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish their claim to a share in the disputed property because their father Anjanappa himself executed the 2002 sale deed alienating the property, and a 2002 partition had already been conducted within the joint family. Key Reasoning: Under Hindu Succession law applicable pre-2004, daughters had limited rights in joint family property. Critically, since the father participated in executing the challenged sale deeds and a family partition occurred during his lifetime, the daughter-plaintiffs could not claim separate rights to the sold property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case