Rajamma vs Hanumanthappa — 679/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o 7 R 1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 16th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KARN410009422022

Case disposed

Filing Number

680/2022

Filing Date

15-11-2022

Registration No

679/2022

Registration Date

15-11-2022

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI

Judge

1029-PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o 7 R 1

Petitioner(s)

Rajamma

Adv. N.N Sridhar

Siddagangamma

Adv. N N SHRIDHAR

Respondent(s)

Hanumanthappa

Narasamma

Rajanna

Jayamma

Lokesh

Geetha

Byrappa

B. Latha

B Hemanth

Muniyappa

M. Swetha

M.Manjula

M. Kiran

Giriyappa

G. Mamatha

G. Swetha

G. Yashoda

G Kumari

M.D. Kowshik

N.C.Prakash

Adv. CHITHRASHEKARAIAH H.A.

T.M Shobha

D20.N C Prakash

D21,T M Shobha

Hearing History

Judge: 1029-PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

16-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

JUDGMENTS

11-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

07-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

23-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Judgment

Case Summary: OS No. 679/2022 Court Decision: The Senior Civil Judge dismissed the plaintiffs' partition suit with costs. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish their claim to a share in the disputed property because their father Anjanappa himself executed the 2002 sale deed alienating the property, and a 2002 partition had already been conducted within the joint family. Key Reasoning: Under Hindu Succession law applicable pre-2004, daughters had limited rights in joint family property. Critically, since the father participated in executing the challenged sale deeds and a family partition occurred during his lifetime, the daughter-plaintiffs could not claim separate rights to the sold property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

23-03-2023
Issue
20-03-2025
Deposition
15-09-2025
Deposition
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS No. 679/2022 Court Decision: The Senior Civil Judge dismissed the plaintiffs' partition suit with costs. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish their claim to a share in the disputed property because their father Anjanappa himself executed the 2002 sale deed alienating the property, and a 2002 partition had already been conducted within the joint family. Key Reasoning: Under Hindu Succession law applicable pre-2004, daughters had limited rights in joint family property. Critically, since the father participated in executing the challenged sale deeds and a family partition occurred during his lifetime, the daughter-plaintiffs could not claim separate rights to the sold property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case