CHANNABASAPPA vs MARAMMA — 66/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21 R 2. Status: Call On. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
EX - Execution Petition Under Order
CNR: KAMS510042442025
Filing Number
66/2025
Filing Date
29-Aug-2025
Registration No
66/2025
Registration Date
01-Sep-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
449-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHANNABASAPPA
Adv. ABHISHEK M
Respondent(s)
-
1.MARAMMA
-
2.VEERABHADRAPPA
-
3.PRAKASH
Case History
-
19-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Apr-2026
Call On
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
26-Mar-2026
Call On
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
14-Mar-2026
Call On
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
13-Mar-2026
Call On
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
09-Feb-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case 66/2025 Summary: The court issued a prohibitory order restraining the judgment debtors (Maramma, Veerabhadrappa, and Prakash) from transferring or charging immovable property (Sy.No.67/2, 0.36 Guntas at Hadya Village, Nanjanagudu Taluk) after they intentionally evaded payment of decreetal money despite notices and movable property attachment. The order must be proclaimed and affixed at the Tahsildar's office, Grama panchayath, and court premises; the Tahsildar is then directed to attach the property and report back. Case adjourned to 26.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Feb-2026
Call On
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
17-Jan-2026
Orders
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
06-Dec-2025
Call On
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
11-Nov-2025
Notice
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
14-Oct-2025
Attachment Of Movables
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
01-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 66/2025
Case 66/2025 Summary: The court issued a prohibitory order restraining the judgment debtors (Maramma, Veerabhadrappa, and Prakash) from transferring or charging immovable property (Sy.No.67/2, 0.36 Guntas at Hadya Village, Nanjanagudu Taluk) after they intentionally evaded payment of decreetal money despite notices and movable property attachment. The order must be proclaimed and affixed at the Tahsildar's office, Grama panchayath, and court premises; the Tahsildar is then directed to attach the property and report back. Case adjourned to 26.03.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts