H.D. MAHADEVASWAMY vs H.S. MAHADEVASWAMY — 95/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7 RULE 1. Status: Call On. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS510008992026
Filing Number
95/2026
Filing Date
19-Feb-2026
Registration No
95/2026
Registration Date
20-Feb-2026
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
449-Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.H.D. MAHADEVASWAMY
Adv. NAGARAJU. K.S.
-
2.UMESHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.H.S. MAHADEVASWAMY
Case History
-
03-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
04-Apr-2026
OrdersView PDF
Summary: Case 95/2026 - H.D. Mahadevaswamy & Umesha v. H.S. Mahadevaswamy Outcome: The court dismissed the interim application (IA No. 1) seeking a temporary injunction. The interim injunction order issued on 21.02.2026 was also vacated/withdrawn. The court found that the petitioners failed to establish a prima-facie case for relief, as their possession and ownership of the disputed property were already disputed by the respondent, supported by documentary evidence (partition deed and co-ownership certificate dated 03.06.2017). Without establishing a prima-facie case, the court declined to consider balance of convenience or irreparable injury arguments. The order clarifies it expresses no opinion on final merits of the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Apr-2026
Call On
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
02-Apr-2026
Order On IA
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
17-Mar-2026
Order On IA
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
14-Mar-2026
Call On
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
13-Mar-2026
Call On
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing On IA
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
21-Feb-2026
OrdersView PDF
-
21-Feb-2026
Summons
Prl CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud
-
20-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 95/2026
Summary: Case 95/2026 - H.D. Mahadevaswamy & Umesha v. H.S. Mahadevaswamy Outcome: The court dismissed the interim application (IA No. 1) seeking a temporary injunction. The interim injunction order issued on 21.02.2026 was also vacated/withdrawn. The court found that the petitioners failed to establish a prima-facie case for relief, as their possession and ownership of the disputed property were already disputed by the respondent, supported by documentary evidence (partition deed and co-ownership certificate dated 03.06.2017). Without establishing a prima-facie case, the court declined to consider balance of convenience or irreparable injury arguments. The order clarifies it expresses no opinion on final merits of the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts