YOGESH H M vs RAJENDRA A M — 315/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/OVIIR1AND2. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLEDC IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS500009462025
Filing Number
322/2025
Filing Date
25-09-2025
Registration No
315/2025
Registration Date
25-09-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
448-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLEDC IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
YOGESH H M
Adv. B L JAGADISH
Respondent(s)
RAJENDRA A M
MANJULA
Hearing History
Judge: 448-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Disposed
SETTLEMENT
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-01-2026 | SETTLEMENT |
| 16-12-2025 | SUMMONS |
| 26-09-2025 | SUMMONS |
| 25-09-2025 | ORDERS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: O.S./315/2025 Yogesh H.M. filed a suit for specific performance seeking execution of a regular sale deed for certain properties against defendants Rajendra A.M. and Manjula. After service of summons, plaintiff and defendant No.1 jointly filed a compromise petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which the court accepted after verifying voluntary consent without coercion or fraud. The court allowed the compromise, directed preparation of a decree incorporating the settlement terms, and ordered full refund of court fees to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S./315/2025 Yogesh H.M. filed a suit for specific performance seeking execution of a regular sale deed for certain properties against defendants Rajendra A.M. and Manjula. After service of summons, plaintiff and defendant No.1 jointly filed a compromise petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which the court accepted after verifying voluntary consent without coercion or fraud. The court allowed the compromise, directed preparation of a decree incorporating the settlement terms, and ordered full refund of court fees to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts