YOGESH H M vs RAJENDRA A M — 315/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/OVIIR1AND2. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLEDC IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS500009462025

Filing Number

322/2025

Filing Date

25-Sep-2025

Registration No

315/2025

Registration Date

25-Sep-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

448-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLEDC IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/OVIIR1AND2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.YOGESH H M

    Adv. B L JAGADISH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJENDRA A M

  2. 2.MANJULA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: O.S./315/2025 Yogesh H.M. filed a suit for specific performance seeking execution of a regular sale deed for certain properties against defendants Rajendra A.M. and Manjula. After service of summons, plaintiff and defendant No.1 jointly filed a compromise petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which the court accepted after verifying voluntary consent without coercion or fraud. The court allowed the compromise, directed preparation of a decree incorporating the settlement terms, and ordered full refund of court fees to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  4. 24-Jan-2026

    Settlement

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  5. 16-Dec-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  6. 26-Sep-2025

    OrdersView PDF

  7. 26-Sep-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Nanjangud

  8. 25-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 25-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 315/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S./315/2025 Yogesh H.M. filed a suit for specific performance seeking execution of a regular sale deed for certain properties against defendants Rajendra A.M. and Manjula. After service of summons, plaintiff and defendant No.1 jointly filed a compromise petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which the court accepted after verifying voluntary consent without coercion or fraud. The court allowed the compromise, directed preparation of a decree incorporating the settlement terms, and ordered full refund of court fees to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case