H.P. SHIVASWAMY vs MOHAMMED SUFIYAN — 146/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order VII, Rule 1, R/w Sec.26. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLEDC IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS500004992025

Case disposed

Filing Number

149/2025

Filing Date

09-06-2025

Registration No

146/2025

Registration Date

10-06-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD

Judge

448-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLEDC IN LOK ADALATH

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section Order VII, Rule 1, R/w Sec.26

Petitioner(s)

H.P. SHIVASWAMY

Adv. K R NAGENDRAPRASAD

Respondent(s)

MOHAMMED SUFIYAN

LAMIS FATHIMA N.

MOHAMMED FAUZAN

Hearing History

Judge: 448-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD

14-03-2026

Disposed

24-02-2026

EVIDENCE

20-02-2026

EVIDENCE

16-12-2025

EVIDENCE

29-11-2025

EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Orders

Case Summary: O.S./146/2025 H.P. Shivaswamy filed a suit for specific performance of contract seeking execution of a regular sale deed for a property against defendants Mohammed Sufiyan, Lamis Fathima N., and Mohammed Fauzan. The court approved a compromise petition jointly filed by both parties after verifying that the settlement was voluntary and free from coercion or fraud. The suit was accordingly compromised as per the agreed terms, and the court directed full refund of court fees to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S./146/2025 H.P. Shivaswamy filed a suit for specific performance of contract seeking execution of a regular sale deed for a property against defendants Mohammed Sufiyan, Lamis Fathima N., and Mohammed Fauzan. The court approved a compromise petition jointly filed by both parties after verifying that the settlement was voluntary and free from coercion or fraud. The suit was accordingly compromised as per the agreed terms, and the court directed full refund of court fees to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case