PUTTASWAMY vs T.C. LALITHAMBA Advocate - SRI. H. V. SREENATH — 60/2021
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 26,. Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS500002552021
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
58/2021
Filing Date
12-04-2021
Registration No
60/2021
Registration Date
21-04-2021
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NANJANGUD
Judge
448-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PUTTASWAMY
Adv. D. JAGADEESH
Respondent(s)
T.C. LALITHAMBA Advocate - SRI. H. V. SREENATH
Hearing History
Judge: 448-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NANJANGUD
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | SUMMONS | |
| 07-03-2026 | SUMMONS | |
| 03-02-2026 | SUMMONS | |
| 30-01-2026 | SUMMONS | |
| 19-01-2026 | SUMMONS |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the defendant's application to amend the written statement in this specific performance suit (O.S.60/2021). The defendant was permitted to delete paragraph 3 and add detailed paragraphs explaining the sale agreement process between parties. Since the plaintiff filed no objections and the amendment would only clarify the defendant's defense without prejudicing the plaintiff, the court granted permission for the amendment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the defendant's application to amend the written statement in this specific performance suit (O.S.60/2021). The defendant was permitted to delete paragraph 3 and add detailed paragraphs explaining the sale agreement process between parties. Since the plaintiff filed no objections and the amendment would only clarify the defendant's defense without prejudicing the plaintiff, the court granted permission for the amendment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts