SANTHOSH SEQUIERA vs GOVINDEGOWDA — 114/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,7,R1AND2,R/WS,26. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS300006912025
Filing Number
113/2025
Filing Date
01-Apr-2025
Registration No
114/2025
Registration Date
02-Apr-2025
Court
PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HUNSUR
Judge
446-Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
Last updated 15-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANTHOSH SEQUIERA
Adv. SHANMUKA N S
Respondent(s)
-
1.GOVINDEGOWDA
-
2.Prop.D2.Smt.Vishala
-
3.Prop.D3.Sunil Kumar G.
-
4.Prop.D4.Anil Kumar G.
Case History
-
20-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jul-2026
Orders
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
10-Jun-2026
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
05-Jun-2026
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
28-Apr-2026
Objection on IA
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
22-Apr-2026
Objection on IA
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
21-Apr-2026
For Amendment
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
07-Apr-2026
OrdersView PDF
-
07-Apr-2026
OrdersView PDF
Summary of Case 114/2025 Court: Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Hunsur Date: 7 April 2026 Plaintiff Santhosh Sequiera filed a suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement against Govinde Gowda. During the suit's pendency, the defendant transferred the disputed property to his wife and children through a partition deed (registered 3 July 2025), with ownership records updated in the names of his sons (Sunil Kumar and Anil Kumar) on 14 July 2025. The plaintiff sought to implead these three family members as additional defendants. The court allowed the application and permitted impleading the proposed defendants as defendants No. 2-4, finding them necessary and proper parties whose presence is essential for effective adjudication, and imposing costs of Rs. 200. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Summons
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
07-Apr-2026
Orders
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
02-Apr-2026
Orders
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
10-Mar-2026
Call On
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
06-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
02-Mar-2026
Objections
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
28-Feb-2026
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
09-Feb-2026
Hearing
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
19-Jan-2026
Objection on IA
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
19-Dec-2025
Objection on IA
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
27-Nov-2025
Objection on IA
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
25-Oct-2025
Objection on IA
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
26-Sep-2025
Notice
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
23-Aug-2025
Notice
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
12-Aug-2025
Notice
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
01-Aug-2025
Objection on IA
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
18-Jul-2025
Objection on IA
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
21-Jun-2025
Written Statement
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
02-May-2025
Objection on IA
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
03-Apr-2025
OrdersView PDF
-
03-Apr-2025
Notice
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hunsur
-
02-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 114/2025
Summary of Case 114/2025 Court: Principal Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Hunsur Date: 7 April 2026 Plaintiff Santhosh Sequiera filed a suit for specific performance of a property sale agreement against Govinde Gowda. During the suit's pendency, the defendant transferred the disputed property to his wife and children through a partition deed (registered 3 July 2025), with ownership records updated in the names of his sons (Sunil Kumar and Anil Kumar) on 14 July 2025. The plaintiff sought to implead these three family members as additional defendants. The court allowed the application and permitted impleading the proposed defendants as defendants No. 2-4, finding them necessary and proper parties whose presence is essential for effective adjudication, and imposing costs of Rs. 200. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts