Karnataka Gramin Bank vs SIDDARAJU — 244/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR.7 RU.1. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS200008362025
Filing Number
247/2025
Filing Date
08-Dec-2025
Registration No
244/2025
Registration Date
08-Dec-2025
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, H D KOTE
Judge
1224-Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Karnataka Gramin Bank
Adv. B S Sangameshwara
Respondent(s)
-
1.SIDDARAJU
-
2.SHIVAIAH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
-
14-Mar-2026
DecreeView PDF
Case Summary: Karnataka Gramin Bank v. Siddaraju & Shivaiah (244/2025) Karnataka Gramin Bank's suit for recovery of Rs. 18,36,925.39 under a simple mortgage against defendants Siddaraju and Shivaiah was settled through compromise before the Lok Adalath on 14 March 2026. The plaintiff reduced its claim to Rs. 9,00,000, which the first defendant paid in full to the bank, resulting in a compromise decree closing the suit as fully satisfied. Court fees were ordered refunded to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
26-Feb-2026
Refer to La/Mediation
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
30-Jan-2026
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote
-
08-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 244/2025
Case Summary: Karnataka Gramin Bank v. Siddaraju & Shivaiah (244/2025) Karnataka Gramin Bank's suit for recovery of Rs. 18,36,925.39 under a simple mortgage against defendants Siddaraju and Shivaiah was settled through compromise before the Lok Adalath on 14 March 2026. The plaintiff reduced its claim to Rs. 9,00,000, which the first defendant paid in full to the bank, resulting in a compromise decree closing the suit as fully satisfied. Court fees were ordered refunded to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts