Karnataka Gramin Bank vs H.K. VIJENDRA — 234/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR.7 R.1. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMS200008222025

Filing Number

239/2025

Filing Date

01-Dec-2025

Registration No

234/2025

Registration Date

01-Dec-2025

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, H D KOTE

Judge

1224-Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section OR.7 R.1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Karnataka Gramin Bank

    Adv. B S Sangameshwara

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.H.K. VIJENDRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    DecreeView PDF

    Case Summary: In Case 234/2025, Karnataka Gramin Bank sued H.K. Vijendra for recovery of Rs. 16,75,366.97 under a simple mortgage. The parties reached a compromise before the Lok Adalath on 14 March 2026, wherein the bank reduced its claim to Rs. 4,75,000, which the defendant fully paid. The court accepted the compromise petition and decreed the suit as fully satisfied, directing refund of court fees to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote

  5. 29-Jan-2026

    Refer to La/Mediation

    Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC, H D Kote

  6. 02-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 01-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 234/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Case 234/2025, Karnataka Gramin Bank sued H.K. Vijendra for recovery of Rs. 16,75,366.97 under a simple mortgage. The parties reached a compromise before the Lok Adalath on 14 March 2026, wherein the bank reduced its claim to Rs. 4,75,000, which the defendant fully paid. The court accepted the compromise petition and decreed the suit as fully satisfied, directing refund of court fees to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case