KARTHIK vs SHANKAR. K — 31/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section OR.VII R.1. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAMS200000962026
Filing Number
33/2026
Filing Date
20-02-2026
Registration No
31/2026
Registration Date
20-02-2026
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, H D KOTE
Judge
1224-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H D KOTE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KARTHIK
Adv. M.E. MAHESH
Respondent(s)
SHANKAR. K
PAVITHRA M.R.
VANSHIKA. S
JAGADEESHA
SHUBHA. S
MASTER. J. PRANAV
SUSHILA
SANTHOSHA. S
SHWETHA
ETHIKSHA
PRASHANTHA. S
THEJASHWINI H.S.
Hearing History
Judge: 1224-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, H D KOTE
Disposed
Refer to LA/Mediation
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Refer to LA/Mediation |
| 21-02-2026 | SUMMONS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 31/2026 before the Senior Civil Judge at H.D. Kote involved Karthik seeking specific performance of a property sale agreement against 12 defendants. The parties filed a compromise petition before Lok Adalath on March 14, 2026, and reached an amicable settlement. The court accepted the compromise, decreeing that defendants must execute and register the sale deed upon receipt of the balance consideration of ₹1,00,000, with provision for court-commissioner execution in case of default. The plaintiff's court fees were ordered refunded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 31/2026 before the Senior Civil Judge at H.D. Kote involved Karthik seeking specific performance of a property sale agreement against 12 defendants. The parties filed a compromise petition before Lok Adalath on March 14, 2026, and reached an amicable settlement. The court accepted the compromise, decreeing that defendants must execute and register the sale deed upon receipt of the balance consideration of ₹1,00,000, with provision for court-commissioner execution in case of default. The plaintiff's court fees were ordered refunded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts