SIDDARTHA.R vs RAMARADYA — 1060/2023
Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section U/S 166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080018462023
Filing Number
1043/2023
Filing Date
15-06-2023
Registration No
1060/2023
Registration Date
15-06-2023
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SIDDARTHA.R
Adv. MAHADEVASWAMY.S
Respondent(s)
RAMARADYA
NAGESH
THE MANAGER, ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Hearing History
Judge: 434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
Disposed
A.D.R.
SUMMONS
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 03-03-2026 | A.D.R. |
| 12-02-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 19-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: In this Lok Adalath proceeding (Case 1060/2023), petitioner Siddartha.R sought compensation from respondents including ICICI Lombard General Insurance. The Lok Adalath accepted a joint settlement memo whereby the parties agreed to settle for ₹3,50,000. The court approved the settlement, finding the petitioner voluntarily agreed without coercion and was competent to enter the compromise. The court directed ICICI Lombard to deposit the full settlement amount immediately, considering the petitioner's medical expenses and injury severity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In this Lok Adalath proceeding (Case 1060/2023), petitioner Siddartha.R sought compensation from respondents including ICICI Lombard General Insurance. The Lok Adalath accepted a joint settlement memo whereby the parties agreed to settle for ₹3,50,000. The court approved the settlement, finding the petitioner voluntarily agreed without coercion and was competent to enter the compromise. The court directed ICICI Lombard to deposit the full settlement amount immediately, considering the petitioner's medical expenses and injury severity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts