RAVI C S vs CHANDRA Advocate - VISHNUVARDHAN — 845/2023
Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section U/S 166. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080014082023
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
847/2023
Filing Date
23-05-2023
Registration No
845/2023
Registration Date
23-05-2023
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAVI C S
Adv. B. RAMEGOWDA
Respondent(s)
CHANDRA Advocate - VISHNUVARDHAN
THE MANAGER, CHOLAMANDALAM INSURANCE COMPANY
Adv. Manoj VG
Hearing History
Judge: 434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-06-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 02-06-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 05-05-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 24-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 15-04-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
This is a Motor Accident Claim (MVC) case in the Court of Small Causes and MACT, Mysuru. The document records witness examination (RW.2, an Assistant Legal Manager from Cholamandalam Insurance Company) on 13.01.2026. The insurance company's witness testified supporting an affidavit and produced authorization letter and insurance policy documents, seeking dismissal of the petition. During cross-examination, the petitioner's counsel challenged whether the insurance company verified the driver's license validity with RTO, and contended the company produced only a charge sheet without independent documentation proving the driver lacked a valid license. The document does not contain a final judgment or order, only the witness examination record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Motor Accident Claim (MVC) case in the Court of Small Causes and MACT, Mysuru. The document records witness examination (RW.2, an Assistant Legal Manager from Cholamandalam Insurance Company) on 13.01.2026. The insurance company's witness testified supporting an affidavit and produced authorization letter and insurance policy documents, seeking dismissal of the petition. During cross-examination, the petitioner's counsel challenged whether the insurance company verified the driver's license validity with RTO, and contended the company produced only a charge sheet without independent documentation proving the driver lacked a valid license. The document does not contain a final judgment or order, only the witness examination record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts