SATHISH vs SANTHOSH — 410/2023
Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section U/S 166. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080005802023
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
408/2023
Filing Date
04-03-2023
Registration No
410/2023
Registration Date
04-03-2023
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SATHISH
Adv. B.S.SWAMY
Respondent(s)
SANTHOSH
GO DIGIT GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
Adv. Manoj VG
Hearing History
Judge: 434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 25-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 04-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 14-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary of MVC 410/2023 This is a Motor Vehicles Act case before the Court of Sessions & MACT, Mysuru, involving petitioner Sathish against respondents Santhosh and Go Digit General Insurance Co. Ltd. The document records witness examination on 04.04.2026, where the witness (testifying for Respondent No.2/the insurance company) was cross-examined by the petitioner's advocate. The witness testified that Santhosh (Respondent No.1) was riding the motorcycle at the time of the accident, and contradicted the insurance company's defense position. Respondent No.2 (insurance company) prayed for dismissal of the petition in the interest of justice and equity. The matter remains in examination stage with no final order on the petition's merits recorded in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of MVC 410/2023 This is a Motor Vehicles Act case before the Court of Sessions & MACT, Mysuru, involving petitioner Sathish against respondents Santhosh and Go Digit General Insurance Co. Ltd. The document records witness examination on 04.04.2026, where the witness (testifying for Respondent No.2/the insurance company) was cross-examined by the petitioner's advocate. The witness testified that Santhosh (Respondent No.1) was riding the motorcycle at the time of the accident, and contradicted the insurance company's defense position. Respondent No.2 (insurance company) prayed for dismissal of the petition in the interest of justice and equity. The matter remains in examination stage with no final order on the petition's merits recorded in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts