SATHISH vs SANTHOSH — 410/2023

Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section U/S 166. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAMS080005802023

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

Filing Number

408/2023

Filing Date

04-03-2023

Registration No

410/2023

Registration Date

04-03-2023

Court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU

Judge

434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section U/S 166

Petitioner(s)

SATHISH

Adv. B.S.SWAMY

Respondent(s)

SANTHOSH

GO DIGIT GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,

Adv. Manoj VG

Hearing History

Judge: 434-JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES

07-05-2026

EVIDENCE

25-04-2026

EVIDENCE

04-04-2026

EVIDENCE

14-03-2026

EVIDENCE

13-02-2026

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

12-03-2025
Issue
11-08-2025
Deposition
26-09-2025
Deposition
06-11-2025
Deposition
17-01-2026
Deposition
04-04-2026
Deposition

Summary of MVC 410/2023 This is a Motor Vehicles Act case before the Court of Sessions & MACT, Mysuru, involving petitioner Sathish against respondents Santhosh and Go Digit General Insurance Co. Ltd. The document records witness examination on 04.04.2026, where the witness (testifying for Respondent No.2/the insurance company) was cross-examined by the petitioner's advocate. The witness testified that Santhosh (Respondent No.1) was riding the motorcycle at the time of the accident, and contradicted the insurance company's defense position. Respondent No.2 (insurance company) prayed for dismissal of the petition in the interest of justice and equity. The matter remains in examination stage with no final order on the petition's merits recorded in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of MVC 410/2023 This is a Motor Vehicles Act case before the Court of Sessions & MACT, Mysuru, involving petitioner Sathish against respondents Santhosh and Go Digit General Insurance Co. Ltd. The document records witness examination on 04.04.2026, where the witness (testifying for Respondent No.2/the insurance company) was cross-examined by the petitioner's advocate. The witness testified that Santhosh (Respondent No.1) was riding the motorcycle at the time of the accident, and contradicted the insurance company's defense position. Respondent No.2 (insurance company) prayed for dismissal of the petition in the interest of justice and equity. The matter remains in examination stage with no final order on the petition's merits recorded in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case