SHIVU.H vs ABHISHEK.H.S — 170/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S 166. Status: Summons. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAMS080003682024
Filing Number
182/2024
Filing Date
19-Jan-2024
Registration No
170/2024
Registration Date
23-Jan-2024
Court
JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES, MYSURU
Judge
434-Judge Court Of Small Causes
Last updated 19-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHIVU.H
Adv. N.BASAVARAJ
Respondent(s)
-
1.ABHISHEK.H.S
-
2.THE MANAGER, CHOLAMANDALAM M.S. GENERAL INSURANCE CO.
Case History
-
03-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
05-Jun-2026
Summons
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
28-Apr-2026
Summons
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
07-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
Summary of Case MVC 170/2024 This is a motor vehicle compensation case before the MACT, Mysuru involving petitioner Shivu H. versus Abhishek H.S. and Cholamandalam M.S. General Insurance Co. The court record documents the testimony of Dr. Harsha A.H. (PW.3), a Consultant Neurosurgeon, on 07.02.2026. Dr. Harsha testified regarding the petitioner's injuries from an accident, including tracheostomy performed on 16.01.2024 and facial surgeries. During cross-examination, the respondent's counsel challenged the extent of disability assessed at 32%, questioning whether the neuropsychological assessment report was mechanically generated and whether the petitioner actually exhibited the claimed symptoms. Dr. Harsha maintained his disability assessment and denied deliberately inflating the percentage to support inflated compensation claims. No final order was issued in this excerpt; the case remains in evidentiary stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
08-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
28-Nov-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
28-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
25-Nov-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
25-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
10-Nov-2025
Summons
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
15-Oct-2025
Summons
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
19-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
20-Aug-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
16-Jul-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
16-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
06-Jun-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
06-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
24-Apr-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
22-Mar-2025
IssueView PDF
-
22-Mar-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
20-Feb-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
20-Feb-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
13-Jan-2025
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
06-Dec-2024
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
07-Nov-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
07-Nov-2024
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
27-Sep-2024
IssueView PDF
-
27-Sep-2024
Evidence
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
23-Aug-2024
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
25-Jul-2024
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
27-Jun-2024
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
28-May-2024
Objections
Judge Court Of Small Causes
-
25-Jan-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jan-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 170/2024
Summary of Case MVC 170/2024 This is a motor vehicle compensation case before the MACT, Mysuru involving petitioner Shivu H. versus Abhishek H.S. and Cholamandalam M.S. General Insurance Co. The court record documents the testimony of Dr. Harsha A.H. (PW.3), a Consultant Neurosurgeon, on 07.02.2026. Dr. Harsha testified regarding the petitioner's injuries from an accident, including tracheostomy performed on 16.01.2024 and facial surgeries. During cross-examination, the respondent's counsel challenged the extent of disability assessed at 32%, questioning whether the neuropsychological assessment report was mechanically generated and whether the petitioner actually exhibited the claimed symptoms. Dr. Harsha maintained his disability assessment and denied deliberately inflating the percentage to support inflated compensation claims. No final order was issued in this excerpt; the case remains in evidentiary stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts