H.K PAVITHRA vs KANTHAMANI — 62/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7RULE1. Status: Notice And Objections. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.

Notice And Objections Next hearing 07-Jul-2026

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAMD200004252025

e-Filing Number

22-03-2025

Filing Number

62/2025

Filing Date

22-Mar-2025

Registration No

62/2025

Registration Date

27-Mar-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KRISHNARAJAPETE

Judge

1067-I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Last updated 03-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7RULE1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.H.K PAVITHRA

    Adv. AVINASH M.A.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KANTHAMANI

  2. 2.VINODA S.P

  3. 3.MANOJA S.P

Case History

  1. 07-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Jul-2026

    Notice And Objections

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  3. 27-Jun-2026

    Evidence CIVIL

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    For Appearance Of Parties/Advocates

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 01-Jun-2026

    Evidence CIVIL

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 30-Apr-2026

    Evidence CIVIL

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence CIVIL

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 24-Mar-2026

    Evidence CIVIL

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 05-Mar-2026

    Evidence CIVIL

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 21-Feb-2026

    For Appearance Of Parties/Advocates

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 05-Feb-2026

    Evidence CIVIL

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 19-Jan-2026

    IssueView PDF

    This civil suit (O.S. No. 62/2025) before the Krishnarajapete court involves a property sale dispute between plaintiff H.K. Pavithra and defendants Kanthamani and others. The case raises issues regarding whether an agreement of sale for Rs. 6,00,000/- was executed on 27.01.2021 with Rs. 5,00,000/- received as earnest money, whether the plaintiff demonstrated readiness to perform, and whether the defendants' claim that it was only a nominal security agreement for a Rs. 2,00,000/- loan is valid. The document presented only shows the framing of issues; no final judgment or order has been issued yet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence CIVIL

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  14. 13-Dec-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  15. 13-Nov-2025

    A.D.R.

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  16. 25-Oct-2025

    Arguments CIVIL

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  17. 24-Oct-2025

    Restored

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  18. 24-Oct-2025

    Arguments CIVIL

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  19. 23-Oct-2025

    JudgmentView PDF

  20. 23-Oct-2025

    Disposed

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  21. 13-Oct-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  22. 13-Oct-2025

    Arguments CIVIL

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  23. 09-Oct-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  24. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  25. 15-Sep-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  26. 02-Sep-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  27. 02-Sep-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  28. 30-Jul-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  29. 28-Jun-2025

    Evidence CIVIL

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  30. 28-Apr-2025

    Awiating Services Of Notices/Summons

    I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  31. 27-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 22-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 62/2025

casestatus.in Summary

This civil suit (O.S. No. 62/2025) before the Krishnarajapete court involves a property sale dispute between plaintiff H.K. Pavithra and defendants Kanthamani and others. The case raises issues regarding whether an agreement of sale for Rs. 6,00,000/- was executed on 27.01.2021 with Rs. 5,00,000/- received as earnest money, whether the plaintiff demonstrated readiness to perform, and whether the defendants' claim that it was only a nominal security agreement for a Rs. 2,00,000/- loan is valid. The document presented only shows the framing of issues; no final judgment or order has been issued yet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case