T. G. Rohith vs C. P. Kariappa — 144/2022
Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section U/Sec.166,(a),(b),of,MV,Act. Status: ARGUMENTS Civil. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAKD500005722022
Next Hearing
17th March 2026
Filing Number
144/2022
Filing Date
05-12-2022
Registration No
144/2022
Registration Date
05-12-2022
Court
II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MADIKERI SITTING AT VIRAJPET
Judge
986-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE SITTING AT VIRAJPET
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
T. G. Rohith
Adv. Kashiappa M S
Respondent(s)
C. P. Kariappa
Smt.Jaji
The Branch Manager, M/S United India Insurance Co. Ltd.,
Hearing History
Judge: 986-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE SITTING AT VIRAJPET
ARGUMENTS Civil
ARGUMENTS Civil
ARGUMENTS Civil
EVIDENCE - Civil
EVIDENCE - Civil
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS Civil |
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS Civil |
| 18-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS Civil |
| 10-02-2026 | EVIDENCE - Civil |
| 06-02-2026 | EVIDENCE - Civil |
Interim Orders
This document records the cross-examination of witness T.G. Rohith in a motor vehicle compensation case (MVC.144/2022) on 02.08.2025 before the II Additional District & Sessions Judge, Kodagu-Madikeri. The witness, a pillion rider injured in a 2014 motorcycle accident, testified that the bike lacked valid insurance and the rider lacked a driving license, and denied suggestions that negligence caused the accident or that his injuries have fully healed. No final order or judgment was issued in this excerpt—it is merely a record of witness examination proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document records the cross-examination of witness T.G. Rohith in a motor vehicle compensation case (MVC.144/2022) on 02.08.2025 before the II Additional District & Sessions Judge, Kodagu-Madikeri. The witness, a pillion rider injured in a 2014 motorcycle accident, testified that the bike lacked valid insurance and the rider lacked a driving license, and denied suggestions that negligence caused the accident or that his injuries have fully healed. No final order or judgment was issued in this excerpt—it is merely a record of witness examination proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
More from this court
II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MADIKERI SITTING AT VIRAJPET All courts →Explore other courts