The State by Virajpet Town PS vs Santhosh K N — 5010/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 370(A),of,IPC,4,5,6,immoral,traffic,prerevention,act. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.
SC - SESSION CASES
CNR: KAKD500001942022
Filing Number
5010/2022
Filing Date
12-04-2022
Registration No
5010/2022
Registration Date
12-04-2022
Court
II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MADIKERI SITTING AT VIRAJPET
Judge
986-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE SITTING AT VIRAJPET
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State by Virajpet Town PS (Police Station)
Adv. PP
Respondent(s)
Santhosh K N
Hemalatha S
Shivaraj
Hearing History
Judge: 986-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE SITTING AT VIRAJPET
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
EVIDENCE - Criminal
OBJECTION Criminal
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 03-03-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
| 19-02-2026 | EVIDENCE - Criminal |
| 30-01-2026 | OBJECTION Criminal |
Interim Orders
This document is a witness examination record, not a final court judgment. PSI Anthima M T testified that on 11.01.2021, she recorded a victim's statement (Sec. 161 CrPC) at Sakhi One Stop Center, wherein the victim alleged that accused No.1 and No.2 induced her into sex work at their homestay. The witness testified the statement was properly recorded, videographed, and forwarded to the investigation officer, and denied defense suggestions that the statement was fabricated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a witness examination record, not a final court judgment. PSI Anthima M T testified that on 11.01.2021, she recorded a victim's statement (Sec. 161 CrPC) at Sakhi One Stop Center, wherein the victim alleged that accused No.1 and No.2 induced her into sex work at their homestay. The witness testified the statement was properly recorded, videographed, and forwarded to the investigation officer, and denied defense suggestions that the statement was fabricated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
More from this court
II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MADIKERI SITTING AT VIRAJPET All courts →Explore other courts