Radha B.K vs Sri. Dilan Somanna — 1/2025

Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section U/Sec.166,of,MV,Act. Status: EVIDENCE - Civil. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAKD500000022025

EVIDENCE - Civil

Next Hearing

17th March 2026

Filing Number

1/2025

Filing Date

31-12-2024

Registration No

1/2025

Registration Date

06-01-2025

Court

II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MADIKERI SITTING AT VIRAJPET

Judge

986-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE SITTING AT VIRAJPET

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act 1989 Section U/Sec.166,of,MV,Act

Petitioner(s)

Radha B.K

Adv. Thimmanna M P

Vinu V

Vineeth V

Respondent(s)

Sri. Dilan Somanna

Smt.Ramya M.K

The Manager, National Insurance Company Ltd.,

Hearing History

Judge: 986-II ADDL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE SITTING AT VIRAJPET

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE - Civil

19-02-2026

EVIDENCE - Civil

31-01-2026

EVIDENCE - Civil

07-01-2026

EVIDENCE - Civil

04-12-2025

EVIDENCE - Civil

Interim Orders

17-07-2025
Issue
07-11-2025
Deposition

This document records witness examination proceedings in case MVC.1/2025 before the II Additional District & Sessions Judge at Virajpet, Kodagu. Petitioner Smt. Radha testified on 07.11.2025 regarding her husband's death from a 2016 road traffic accident, submitting medical and death certificates as evidence while denying claims he was on trial driving duty. The document is a procedural record of testimony and cross-examination, not a final court order with a substantive ruling. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This document records witness examination proceedings in case MVC.1/2025 before the II Additional District & Sessions Judge at Virajpet, Kodagu. Petitioner Smt. Radha testified on 07.11.2025 regarding her husband's death from a 2016 road traffic accident, submitting medical and death certificates as evidence while denying claims he was on trial driving duty. The document is a procedural record of testimony and cross-examination, not a final court order with a substantive ruling. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MADIKERI SITTING AT VIRAJPET All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case