Kavva Gudam Mohanreddy s/o Late Kavva Gudam Ellareddy, 56 yrs, R/o 15-20, Kasraim village, Chavella vs Anil Kumar s/o Shamulu, 38 yrs, R/o Gopanpalli8 (B), Tq. Sedam. — 46/2024
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 7. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB710016822024
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
48/2024
Filing Date
08-04-2024
Registration No
46/2024
Registration Date
08-04-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kavva Gudam Mohanreddy s/o Late Kavva Gudam Ellareddy, 56 yrs, R/o 15-20, Kasraim village, Chavella
Adv. SURENDRA.K.DESHPANDE
Respondent(s)
Anil Kumar s/o Shamulu, 38 yrs, R/o Gopanpalli8 (B), Tq. Sedam.
Hearing History
Judge: 650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
OBJECTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-04-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 15-04-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 28-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 17-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 13-03-2026 | OBJECTION |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 46/2024 Case: OS No. 46/2024 (Civil Suit) Petitioner: Kavva Gudam Mohanreddy Respondent: Anil Kumar Date of Order: 28-03-2026 The court recorded the cross-examination testimony of Defendant-Witness-1 (Anil Kumar) regarding a disputed land transaction. The defendant admitted to receiving ₹25 lakh from the plaintiff and acknowledged signing documents (Exhibits 1-4) related to the property sale. Key admissions include receiving ₹3 lakh cash and a ₹22 lakh check on specific dates, though he contested certain aspects of the transaction value and conditions. The case proceeded with examination of documentary evidence and witness testimony regarding an alleged land sale agreement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 46/2024 Case: OS No. 46/2024 (Civil Suit) Petitioner: Kavva Gudam Mohanreddy Respondent: Anil Kumar Date of Order: 28-03-2026 The court recorded the cross-examination testimony of Defendant-Witness-1 (Anil Kumar) regarding a disputed land transaction. The defendant admitted to receiving ₹25 lakh from the plaintiff and acknowledged signing documents (Exhibits 1-4) related to the property sale. Key admissions include receiving ₹3 lakh cash and a ₹22 lakh check on specific dates, though he contested certain aspects of the transaction value and conditions. The case proceeded with examination of documentary evidence and witness testimony regarding an alleged land sale agreement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts