Jagadish Son of Shamappa Gaddamidi age 19 years occ Agri vs Pentappa S/o Narsappa Gaddamidi age 54 years, occ.Agril. — 3/2016
Case under U/s 54 of Cpc Section 54. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
FDP - Petitioner For Final Decree pr
CNR: KAKB710002062016
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
3/2016
Filing Date
21-11-2016
Registration No
3/2016
Registration Date
24-11-2016
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SEDAM
Judge
650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jagadish Son of Shamappa Gaddamidi age 19 years occ Agri
Adv. JAGADISH S.M.
Ravi Son of Shamappa Gaddamidi Age 16 yrs Occ Student Resident of of Konthanpalli now RO at Surwar
Jaishree Daughter of of Shamappa Gaddamidi Age 26 yrs Occ Agri and household Resident of Konthanpall
Sharada Daughter of Shamappa Gaddamidi Age 22 yrs Occ Agri and household Resident of of Konthanpalli
Godavari Wife of Shamappa Gaddamidi Age 47 yrs Occ Agri and household Resident of of Konthanpalli no
Respondent(s)
Pentappa S/o Narsappa Gaddamidi age 54 years, occ.Agril.
Bichchappa Son of Narsappa Gaddamidi Age 79 yrs Occ Agri Resident of of Konthanpalli Tq Sedam
Bhimappa Son of Ashappa Gaddamidi Age 49 yrs Occ Agri Resident of of Konthanpalli Tq Sedam
Savitramma Wife of Ramappa Gaddamidi Age 54 yrs Occ Agri Resident of of Konthanpalli Tq Sedam
Vishanu Son of Ramappa Gaddamidi Age 27 yrs Occ Agri Resident of of Konthanpalli Tq Sedam
Hearing History
Judge: 650-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , SEDAM.
HEARING
OBJECTION
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | HEARING | |
| 28-03-2026 | OBJECTION | |
| 23-03-2026 | SUMMONS | |
| 18-03-2026 | SUMMONS | |
| 07-03-2026 | SUMMONS |
Interim Orders
The court granted respondents 6 and 7's applications to be impleaded as parties to the partition suit. Finding that these daughters are coparceners under the amended Hindu Succession Act and were unjustly excluded from the original suit, the court issued a preliminary decree allotting each of them (along with the petitioners and respondent 1) an equal 1/4th share in the suit properties. Respondents 6 and 7 were directed to pay requisite court fees for their shares, with the matter scheduled for further hearing on 6.7.2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted respondents 6 and 7's applications to be impleaded as parties to the partition suit. Finding that these daughters are coparceners under the amended Hindu Succession Act and were unjustly excluded from the original suit, the court issued a preliminary decree allotting each of them (along with the petitioners and respondent 1) an equal 1/4th share in the suit properties. Respondents 6 and 7 were directed to pay requisite court fees for their shares, with the matter scheduled for further hearing on 6.7.2024. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts