HAMPAMMA WO SIDDALINGAPPA GOUDA vs VENKANGOUDA @ VENKATGOUDA SANGANGOUDA Advocate - C.B.AWANTI — 148/2011
Case under U/o Vii Rule 1 R/w Sec. 26 C.p.c Section cpc. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB510005422011
Next Hearing
07th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Date
24-02-2011
Registration No
148/2011
Registration Date
24-02-2011
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHITAPUR
Judge
951-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Chittapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HAMPAMMA WO SIDDALINGAPPA GOUDA
Adv. G.R.K
Respondent(s)
VENKANGOUDA @ VENKATGOUDA SANGANGOUDA Advocate - C.B.AWANTI
Basawarajgouda S/o Sugangouda
Mallangouda S/o Sugangouda
Sarnamma W/o Sharappagouda
Rajamma W/o Venkangouda(Legal Heir)
Hearing History
Judge: 951-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Chittapur
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 07-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 31-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 20-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL | |
| 06-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Original Suit No. 148/2011 (dated 07-03-2026) This is a property partition dispute in Kannada involving inheritance of agricultural land. The court heard witness testimony regarding the distribution of ancestral property among multiple defendants and the deceased plaintiff. The witness testified about land ownership shares, including specific acreage amounts held under various survey numbers by different parties. The court adjourned the case to allow remaining defendants to present their arguments, with the case continuing for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Original Suit No. 148/2011 (dated 07-03-2026) This is a property partition dispute in Kannada involving inheritance of agricultural land. The court heard witness testimony regarding the distribution of ancestral property among multiple defendants and the deceased plaintiff. The witness testified about land ownership shares, including specific acreage amounts held under various survey numbers by different parties. The court adjourned the case to allow remaining defendants to present their arguments, with the case continuing for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts