Ashok S/o Devappa Dahihande age 67 yrs R/o H.No.16-34, Maratha Galli Behind Ambedkar Chowk Wadi vs Tarachand S/o Kundalmal Mantri age58yrs R/o H.No.18-106, Ward No.18 Near Old Police Station, Wadi — 32/2019
Case under U/o Vii Rule 1 R/w Sec. 26 C.p.c Section 26ofCPC. Status: ORDERS. Next hearing: 25th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB510002282019
Next Hearing
25th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
35/2019
Filing Date
16-04-2019
Registration No
32/2019
Registration Date
18-04-2019
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHITAPUR
Judge
951-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Chittapur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ashok S/o Devappa Dahihande age 67 yrs R/o H.No.16-34, Maratha Galli Behind Ambedkar Chowk Wadi
Adv. S.N.Shinde
Respondent(s)
Tarachand S/o Kundalmal Mantri age58yrs R/o H.No.18-106, Ward No.18 Near Old Police Station, Wadi
Hearing History
Judge: 951-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Chittapur
ORDERS
HEARING
OBJECTION
OBJECTION
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | ORDERS | |
| 27-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 07-03-2026 | OBJECTION | |
| 04-03-2026 | OBJECTION | |
| 19-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a civil case (Original Suit No. 32/2019) heard on 13-01-2026 in Kannada. The court examined witness testimony and documentary evidence (promissory notes NIP-8, 9, 10 and cheques) related to alleged loans totaling Rs. 5,77,000 provided by the plaintiff to the defendant. The court found credibility issues with the documents, questioned the defendant's signatures and the authenticity of the transactions, and noted that the defendant had relocated to Hyderabad. The case was adjourned for further proceedings with no final judgment delivered in this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a civil case (Original Suit No. 32/2019) heard on 13-01-2026 in Kannada. The court examined witness testimony and documentary evidence (promissory notes NIP-8, 9, 10 and cheques) related to alleged loans totaling Rs. 5,77,000 provided by the plaintiff to the defendant. The court found credibility issues with the documents, questioned the defendant's signatures and the authenticity of the transactions, and noted that the defendant had relocated to Hyderabad. The case was adjourned for further proceedings with no final judgment delivered in this order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts