Mohd Ismail S/o Mohd Hussain Katgar vs Shamsundar S/o Shantraj — 40/2017

Case under Order 7 Rule 10 Cpc Section 12. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB510000962017

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

Next Hearing

23rd March 2026

Filing Number

40/2017

Filing Date

19-04-2017

Registration No

40/2017

Registration Date

20-04-2017

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHITAPUR

Judge

951-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Chittapur

Acts & Sections

Order 7 Rule 10 Cpc Section 12

Petitioner(s)

Mohd Ismail S/o Mohd Hussain Katgar

Adv. M.V.LADDA

Respondent(s)

Shamsundar S/o Shantraj

Mareamma W/o Shantraj

Hearing History

Judge: 951-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Chittapur

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

10-02-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

27-01-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

08-01-2026

EVIDENCE-CIVIL

05-12-2025

SUMMONS

Interim Orders

14-02-2018
Deposition
28-06-2022
Deposition
20-07-2022
Deposition
22-11-2022
Deposition
19-07-2023
Issue
04-09-2025
Deposition
22-09-2025
Deposition

Case Summary Original Suit No. 40/2017 — The court examined testimony from the defendant's counsel regarding a property dispute dating to 1975. The plaintiff acknowledged filing a false suit based on greed, admitted to providing forged documents and perjured testimony, and conceded having no legal authority to bring the case. The court found the defendant and their family have legitimately occupied and maintained the disputed property since 1975. The suit is dismissed. No further proceedings are scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Original Suit No. 40/2017 — The court examined testimony from the defendant's counsel regarding a property dispute dating to 1975. The plaintiff acknowledged filing a false suit based on greed, admitted to providing forged documents and perjured testimony, and conceded having no legal authority to bring the case. The court found the defendant and their family have legitimately occupied and maintained the disputed property since 1975. The suit is dismissed. No further proceedings are scheduled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHITAPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case