Bagani Srinivas S/o Kishtayya Bagani Age 42 Years Occ Agriculture vs Anil S/o Venkatayya Age 34 Years Occ Agriculture — 37/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section VIIRule. Status: Summons. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB410000672026
Filing Number
37/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
37/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHINCHOLI
Judge
828-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Bagani Srinivas S/o Kishtayya Bagani Age 42 Years Occ Agriculture
Adv. SHRIMANT D.KATTIMANI
-
2.Gude Bhupal S/o Gude Pentaiah Age 41 Years Occ Agriculture
-
3.Ailla Mallikarjuna Goud S/o Nagabhushanam Goud Age 45 Years Occ Agriculture
Respondent(s)
-
1.Anil S/o Venkatayya Age 34 Years Occ Agriculture
-
2.Nayini Satish Kumar S/o Nayini Rama Gouda Age 47 Years Occ Agriculture
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-Apr-2026
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC,Chincholi
-
13-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: OS 37/2026 The court granted an ex-parte temporary injunction restraining the defendants from alienating the disputed property until the next hearing date. The plaintiffs alleged the defendants fraudulently obtained a registered sale deed without full payment and sought declaration, cancellation of the deed, and perpetual injunction. Finding a prima facie case and balance of convenience favoring the plaintiffs, the court issued the restraint order and directed the issuance of notice and summons to defendants. The case is returnable on 21-04-2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 37/2026
Case Summary: OS 37/2026 The court granted an ex-parte temporary injunction restraining the defendants from alienating the disputed property until the next hearing date. The plaintiffs alleged the defendants fraudulently obtained a registered sale deed without full payment and sought declaration, cancellation of the deed, and perpetual injunction. Finding a prima facie case and balance of convenience favoring the plaintiffs, the court issued the restraint order and directed the issuance of notice and summons to defendants. The case is returnable on 21-04-2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts