Smt.Rukmabai W/o Maruthi Kolekar @ Marathe D/o Late Yashwant @ Vishwanatappa Palave Age-58Yrs vs Khandu S/o Late Yashwant @ Vishwantappa Palave Age-56Yrs Occ Agri R/o Indira Nagar Afzalpur — 35/2021
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc Section CIVIL. Status: JUDGEMENT. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB310000972021
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
35/2021
Filing Date
30-07-2021
Registration No
35/2021
Registration Date
02-08-2021
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR
Judge
974-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and J.M.F.C. ,AFZALPUR.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt.Rukmabai W/o Maruthi Kolekar @ Marathe D/o Late Yashwant @ Vishwanatappa Palave Age-58Yrs
Adv. S.K.Pujari
Respondent(s)
Khandu S/o Late Yashwant @ Vishwantappa Palave Age-56Yrs Occ Agri R/o Indira Nagar Afzalpur
Smt. Gangubai W/o Khandu Palave Age52Yrs Occ Housewor and Agri
Mukesh S/o Khandu Palave Age-32Yrs Occ Agri
Vijaykumar S/o Channayya Hiremath Age-40Yrs Occ Agri
D5 Smt. Bhagubai W/o Bhimrao Khandekar Age.major Occ.Housework R/o Kallappawadi Tq and dist Solapur
Adv. K.G.Pujari Adv.
D6 Yallalinga S/o Kallappa Badadal,Occ.Agriculture,R/o Udachanhatti Tq Afzalpur Dist Kalaburagi
Adv. K.G.Pujari
D7 Shivaraj S/o Ameenappa Pujari,occ.Agriculture R/o Udachanhatti Tq Afzalpur Dist kalaburagi
Adv. K.G.Pujari Adv.
D8 Raju S/o Kallappa Badadal, Occ.Agriculture R/o Udachan Tq Afzalpur Dist Kalaburagi
Adv. K.G.Pujari Adv.
Hearing History
Judge: 974-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and J.M.F.C. ,AFZALPUR.
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 27-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL | |
| 24-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL | |
| 13-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL | |
| 07-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Summary: In O.S. No. 35/2021, the court heard witness testimony on 24-02-2026 regarding a property dispute. The plaintiff (Rukmabai) claims ownership of ancestral property, while the defendants dispute her rights. The court found that the plaintiff filed the case in 2021 claiming the property belonged to the first defendant's ancestors, but evidence shows the plaintiff herself purchased the land in 2022. The court ruled that the second defendant had no authority to sell the disputed property and dismissed the plaintiff's claims accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In O.S. No. 35/2021, the court heard witness testimony on 24-02-2026 regarding a property dispute. The plaintiff (Rukmabai) claims ownership of ancestral property, while the defendants dispute her rights. The court found that the plaintiff filed the case in 2021 claiming the property belonged to the first defendant's ancestors, but evidence shows the plaintiff herself purchased the land in 2022. The court ruled that the second defendant had no authority to sell the disputed property and dismissed the plaintiff's claims accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts