Pradeepa S/o Basavaraj Patil vs Megharani D/o Hanamantarao Patil — 30/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7 rule 1 2. Status: ORDERS-. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB310000912025

ORDERS-

Next Hearing

09th April 2026

e-Filing Number

02-03-2025

Filing Number

30/2025

Filing Date

10-03-2025

Registration No

30/2025

Registration Date

10-03-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR

Judge

974-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and J.M.F.C. ,AFZALPUR.

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 7 rule 1 2

Petitioner(s)

Pradeepa S/o Basavaraj Patil

Adv. Ravindra Babaleshwar

Respondent(s)

Megharani D/o Hanamantarao Patil

Hearing History

Judge: 974-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and J.M.F.C. ,AFZALPUR.

28-03-2026

ORDERS-

26-03-2026

TO HEAR

24-03-2026

TO HEAR

23-03-2026

TO HEAR

18-03-2026

TO HEAR

Interim Orders

10-03-2025
Orders
01-09-2025
Orders
01-09-2025
Issue
29-11-2025
Deposition
24-01-2026
Orders

Case Summary Interim Application (IA No-2) REJECTED The court rejected the plaintiff's application seeking a temporary injunction to restrain the defendant from interfering with the disputed property (3 acres of land). The judge found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as he was claiming possession rights under an unregistered agreement dated 05-04-2022 while the defendant held a registered sale deed dated 04-04-2022. The balance of convenience favored the defendant since granting the injunction would cause greater harm to her registered interests than refusing it would cause the plaintiff, who can seek remedies on merit in the main suit for specific performance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Interim Application (IA No-2) REJECTED The court rejected the plaintiff's application seeking a temporary injunction to restrain the defendant from interfering with the disputed property (3 acres of land). The judge found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as he was claiming possession rights under an unregistered agreement dated 05-04-2022 while the defendant held a registered sale deed dated 04-04-2022. The balance of convenience favored the defendant since granting the injunction would cause greater harm to her registered interests than refusing it would cause the plaintiff, who can seek remedies on merit in the main suit for specific performance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, AFZALPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case