CHANDRAVVA GOVINDAPPA LAMANI vs GANGAVVA BALAPPA CHIKKAWAD Advocate - S.S.KAMARADDI. — 129/2010
Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHV600001592010
Next Hearing
17th March 2026
Filing Number
129/2010
Filing Date
23-04-2010
Registration No
129/2010
Registration Date
23-04-2010
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAVANUR
Judge
361-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC
Petitioner(s)
CHANDRAVVA GOVINDAPPA LAMANI
Adv. N S PATIL
SANGAVVA FAKKIRAPPA LAMANI
Adv. N S PATIL
NEELAVVA MAHADEVAPPA MANAPPA ALIAS MAHADEVAPPA
Adv. N S PATIL
CHANNAPPA LAKKAPPA LAMANI
Adv. N S PATIL
KRISHNAPPA CHANNAPPA LAMANI
Adv. N S PATIL
NAGAVVA RAMACHANDRA LAMANI
Adv. N S PATIL
DHARMAPPA CHANNAPPA LAMANI
Adv. N S PATIL
PUTTAVVA NINGAPPA LAMANI
Adv. N S PATIL
Respondent(s)
GANGAVVA BALAPPA CHIKKAWAD Advocate - S.S.KAMARADDI.
HIRAVVA MALLAPPA LAMANI
Adv. S.S.KAMARADDI.
NAGAVVA MALLAPPA LAMANI
Adv. S.S.KAMARADDI.
MAHADEVAPPA MALLAPPA LAMANI
Adv. S.S.KAMARADDI.
MALLAVVA @ MALAVVA MALLAPPA LAMANI
Adv. S.S.KAMARADDI.
SANTOSH MALLAPPA LAMANI
Adv. S.S.KAMARADDI.
Hearing History
Judge: 361-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
ORDERS
Objection
Objection
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 11-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 04-03-2026 | Objection |
| 27-02-2026 | Objection |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Petition Allowed (Partially) The court allowed the defendants' application (I.A. No. XXIII) to recall Prosecution Witness 2 (PW-2) for further cross-examination under Order XVIII Rule 17 of the CPC. The defendants cited oversight during the initial cross-examination and the need to put material questions to support their defense in this 15-year-old partition suit. The court granted one additional opportunity for cross-examination, imposing a cost of Rs. 500 and requiring completion within a single hearing without further adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Petition Allowed (Partially) The court allowed the defendants' application (I.A. No. XXIII) to recall Prosecution Witness 2 (PW-2) for further cross-examination under Order XVIII Rule 17 of the CPC. The defendants cited oversight during the initial cross-examination and the need to put material questions to support their defense in this 15-year-old partition suit. The court granted one additional opportunity for cross-examination, imposing a cost of Rs. 500 and requiring completion within a single hearing without further adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts