Ramappa S/o Fakkirappa Narasagondar vs Sureshappa S/o Puttappa Kalledevaru Advocate - B.G.R. — 105/2021
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 and 3 Cpc Section U/SEC.26CPC. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHV520006792021
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
105/2021
Filing Date
20-04-2021
Registration No
105/2021
Registration Date
20-04-2021
Court
PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND I ADDL. JMFC, RANEBENNUR
Judge
359-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT RANEBENNUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramappa S/o Fakkirappa Narasagondar
Adv. PRAVEEN.V.KULKARNI
Respondent(s)
Sureshappa S/o Puttappa Kalledevaru Advocate - B.G.R.
Smt.Ratnavva W/o Sureshappa Kalledevaru
Adv. B.G.R.
Hearing History
Judge: 359-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT RANEBENNUR
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
Payment
ORDERS
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 09-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 31-01-2026 | Payment |
| 24-01-2026 | ORDERS |
| 12-01-2026 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Summary The court allowed the defendants' application (IA No.6) to amend paragraph 5 of their written statement under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC regarding facts relating to a suit wall. The court found that the proposed amendment was necessary for proper adjudication, the defendants exercised due diligence, and no prejudice would be caused to the plaintiff since evidence had not yet commenced. The defendants were directed to file the amended written statement within 14 days, with costs of Rs.500/- imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed the defendants' application (IA No.6) to amend paragraph 5 of their written statement under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC regarding facts relating to a suit wall. The court found that the proposed amendment was necessary for proper adjudication, the defendants exercised due diligence, and no prejudice would be caused to the plaintiff since evidence had not yet commenced. The defendants were directed to file the amended written statement within 14 days, with costs of Rs.500/- imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts