Virupakshappa S/o Mukappa Dyavannanavar vs Umesha S/o Rajappa Talawar — 239/2017

Case under Order 7 Rule1and 2 Cpc Section 712. Status: HEARING ON I A. Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAHV310004182017

HEARING ON I A

Next Hearing

03rd June 2026

Filing Number

242/2017

Filing Date

09-08-2017

Registration No

239/2017

Registration Date

09-08-2017

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HANGAL

Judge

356-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC

Acts & Sections

Order 7 Rule1and 2 Cpc Section 712

Petitioner(s)

Virupakshappa S/o Mukappa Dyavannanavar

Adv. R V WODEYAR

Respondent(s)

Umesha S/o Rajappa Talawar

Savithra W/o Umesha Talawar

Santhosha Rajappa Talawar

Hearing History

Judge: 356-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC

06-03-2026

HEARING ON I A

04-02-2026

HEARING ON I A

05-01-2026

HEARING ON I A

03-11-2025

HEARING ON I A

17-09-2025

Objection to I A

Interim Orders

12-11-2021
Deposition
30-11-2021
Deposition
07-02-2022
Deposition
04-03-2022
Deposition
25-08-2022
Deposition
15-09-2022
Deposition
30-01-2023
Deposition
30-10-2019
Issue
15-03-2024
Deposition
27-04-2024
Deposition
03-07-2024
Deposition

Summary The court order dated 03-07-2024 in case OS 239/2017 addresses a property dispute involving 4 acres of land. The court ruled that while Section 175 IPC applies, Section 175/4 IPC does not apply to the case. The court directed that the second respondent must comply with the conditions stipulated in the court documents and ordered compensation of Rs. 94,000 to be paid, with Rs. 25,000 allocated for the appellant's legal expenses, while rejecting certain contentions raised during the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court order dated 03-07-2024 in case OS 239/2017 addresses a property dispute involving 4 acres of land. The court ruled that while Section 175 IPC applies, Section 175/4 IPC does not apply to the case. The court directed that the second respondent must comply with the conditions stipulated in the court documents and ordered compensation of Rs. 94,000 to be paid, with Rs. 25,000 allocated for the appellant's legal expenses, while rejecting certain contentions raised during the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HANGAL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case