Manjunatha vs Executive officer, Taluk Panchyath, Channarayapatna. — 111/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O 7 Rule 1 and 2 of C.P.C. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHS610003032026
Filing Number
110/2026
Filing Date
21-Jan-2026
Registration No
111/2026
Registration Date
21-Jan-2026
Court
PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHANNARAYAPATNA
Judge
350-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Manjunatha
Adv. D.S. UMESH
Respondent(s)
-
1.Executive officer, Taluk Panchyath, Channarayapatna.
-
2.Panchyath Development officer. Baguru Panchyath
-
3.Radha
Case History
-
22-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-Apr-2026
Written Statement
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Mar-2026
Objection
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Feb-2026
Objection
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Feb-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case 111/2026 Summary The court granted Manjunatha's interim application (I.A. No.1) seeking to restrain the defendants from interfering with his peaceful possession of a vacant property inherited from his grandfather. The court issued a status-quo order prohibiting the defendants from constructing a road on the suit schedule property until the next hearing on 18.02.2026, finding prima facie that the plaintiff has legitimate possession rights. The order is conditional on the plaintiff complying with CPC Order 39 Rule 3. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Feb-2026
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Feb-2026
Orders.
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Feb-2026
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 111/2026
Case 111/2026 Summary The court granted Manjunatha's interim application (I.A. No.1) seeking to restrain the defendants from interfering with his peaceful possession of a vacant property inherited from his grandfather. The court issued a status-quo order prohibiting the defendants from constructing a road on the suit schedule property until the next hearing on 18.02.2026, finding prima facie that the plaintiff has legitimate possession rights. The order is conditional on the plaintiff complying with CPC Order 39 Rule 3. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts