MALLESHA (DECEASED)(Legal Heir) vs CHIEF EXECUTIVE, KARNATAKA GOVERNMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU. — 256/2024

Case under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act Section U/Sec.64. Status: First Hearing. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

First Hearing Next hearing 22-Jun-2026

L.A.C. - Land Acquisition Cases

CNR: KAHS010054902024

Filing Number

256/2024

Filing Date

30-Aug-2024

Registration No

256/2024

Registration Date

30-Aug-2024

Court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN

Judge

336-Addl. District And Sessions Judge

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act Section U/Sec.64

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MALLESHA (DECEASED)(Legal Heir)

    Adv. B.E.NATESH KUMAR1.

  2. 2.SUMITHRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHIEF EXECUTIVE, KARNATAKA GOVERNMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU.

  2. 2.CHIEF SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT , BENGALURU

  3. 3.MANAGING DIRECTOR, KAVERI IRRIGATION COPORATION LTD., BENGALURU.

  4. 4.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, YAGACHI NALA YOJANA DIVISION, BELUR.

  5. 5.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HASSAN

  6. 6.SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, HRP-2, HASSAN.

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Jun-2026

    First Hearing

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    This case (LAC 256/2024) involves a land acquisition dispute wherein petitioner Sumithra (legal heir of deceased Mallesha) challenges the acquisition proceedings by respondent government agencies for irrigation purposes. The court found that proper statutory notices under Sections 4(1) and 6(1) were not effectively served on the petitioner, and the compensation awarded was allegedly inadequate. The petitioner contends that the land contained irrigation channels and that necessary survey documents were not properly presented during proceedings, affecting the valuation of the property taken. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    First Hearing

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    First Hearing

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    First Hearing

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  7. 04-Dec-2025

    First Hearing

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  8. 27-Oct-2025

    First Hearing

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  9. 13-Oct-2025

    First Hearing

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  10. 22-Sep-2025

    First Hearing

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  11. 15-Sep-2025

    First Hearing

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  12. 30-Aug-2025

    First Hearing

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  13. 18-Aug-2025

    First Hearing

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  14. 05-Jul-2025

    First Hearing

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  15. 24-Mar-2025

    First Hearing

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  16. 18-Feb-2025

    First Hearing

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  17. 07-Dec-2024

    First Hearing

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  18. 31-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 30-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 256/2024

casestatus.in Summary

This case (LAC 256/2024) involves a land acquisition dispute wherein petitioner Sumithra (legal heir of deceased Mallesha) challenges the acquisition proceedings by respondent government agencies for irrigation purposes. The court found that proper statutory notices under Sections 4(1) and 6(1) were not effectively served on the petitioner, and the compensation awarded was allegedly inadequate. The petitioner contends that the land contained irrigation channels and that necessary survey documents were not properly presented during proceedings, affecting the valuation of the property taken. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case