Hanumamma vs Ratnamma Advocate - Chethana R, Chethana R — 53/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O.7,R.1. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KADG020008632026

Case disposed

Filing Number

62/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

53/2026

Registration Date

27-02-2026

Court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, DAVANGERE

Judge

244-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM DAVANGERE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section U/O.7,R.1

Petitioner(s)

Hanumamma

Adv. K S Venkatesh

Manjamma

Renukamma

Raghavendra

Basappa

Kalamma

Purandarappa

Vijayamma

Shilpa

Chiranjeevi

Respondent(s)

Ratnamma Advocate - Chethana R, Chethana R

2. Radhamma

Adv. Chethana R,Chethana R

Hearing History

Judge: 244-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM DAVANGERE

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

SETTLEMENT

28-02-2026

SUMMONS

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Orders
14-03-2026
Decree

Summary of Case 53/2026 The Lok-Adalath court accepted a compromise petition settling a property partition dispute among ten plaintiffs and two defendants. The court approved the agreed settlement whereby Plaintiff No. 5 (Sri Basappa) received 2 acres of agricultural land (southern portion of R.S. No. 39/B-3), while Defendants No. 1 and 2 (Smt. Ratnamma and Smt. Radhamma) jointly received 1 acre 5 guntas (northern portion of the same property). The remaining plaintiffs relinquished their claims to the property. The parties were authorized to update revenue records accordingly, and the compromise petition was treated as a final decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 53/2026 The Lok-Adalath court accepted a compromise petition settling a property partition dispute among ten plaintiffs and two defendants. The court approved the agreed settlement whereby Plaintiff No. 5 (Sri Basappa) received 2 acres of agricultural land (southern portion of R.S. No. 39/B-3), while Defendants No. 1 and 2 (Smt. Ratnamma and Smt. Radhamma) jointly received 1 acre 5 guntas (northern portion of the same property). The remaining plaintiffs relinquished their claims to the property. The parties were authorized to update revenue records accordingly, and the compromise petition was treated as a final decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, DAVANGERE All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case