Hanumamma vs Ratnamma Advocate - Chethana R, Chethana R — 53/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O.7,R.1. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KADG020008632026
Filing Number
62/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
53/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, DAVANGERE
Judge
244-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM DAVANGERE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hanumamma
Adv. K S Venkatesh
Manjamma
Renukamma
Raghavendra
Basappa
Kalamma
Purandarappa
Vijayamma
Shilpa
Chiranjeevi
Respondent(s)
Ratnamma Advocate - Chethana R, Chethana R
2. Radhamma
Adv. Chethana R,Chethana R
Hearing History
Judge: 244-PRL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM DAVANGERE
Disposed
SETTLEMENT
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | SETTLEMENT |
| 28-02-2026 | SUMMONS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 53/2026 The Lok-Adalath court accepted a compromise petition settling a property partition dispute among ten plaintiffs and two defendants. The court approved the agreed settlement whereby Plaintiff No. 5 (Sri Basappa) received 2 acres of agricultural land (southern portion of R.S. No. 39/B-3), while Defendants No. 1 and 2 (Smt. Ratnamma and Smt. Radhamma) jointly received 1 acre 5 guntas (northern portion of the same property). The remaining plaintiffs relinquished their claims to the property. The parties were authorized to update revenue records accordingly, and the compromise petition was treated as a final decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 53/2026 The Lok-Adalath court accepted a compromise petition settling a property partition dispute among ten plaintiffs and two defendants. The court approved the agreed settlement whereby Plaintiff No. 5 (Sri Basappa) received 2 acres of agricultural land (southern portion of R.S. No. 39/B-3), while Defendants No. 1 and 2 (Smt. Ratnamma and Smt. Radhamma) jointly received 1 acre 5 guntas (northern portion of the same property). The remaining plaintiffs relinquished their claims to the property. The parties were authorized to update revenue records accordingly, and the compromise petition was treated as a final decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts