T A Usman vs Panchayath Development Officers — 1/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U,O,26,7Rule1ofCPC. Status: OBJECTION. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KACM600000142021
Next Hearing
04th April 2026
Filing Number
1/2021
Filing Date
16-01-2021
Registration No
1/2021
Registration Date
16-01-2021
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SRINGERI
Judge
225-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Sringeri
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
T A Usman
Adv. V.R.Natashekhar
Respondent(s)
Panchayath Development Officers
Hearing History
Judge: 225-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Sringeri
OBJECTION
OBJECTION
ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 06-03-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 12-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 09-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 28-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Court: Civil Judge & J.M.F.C, Sringeri Case: O.S. No. 1/2021 Outcome: The court has rejected the plaintiff's testimony as unreliable and found it to be false. The witness (PW-01) made contradictory statements regarding land construction materials, the shelter scheme allotment, and the plaintiff's residence. The court noted discrepancies between the witness's claims and photographic evidence (NIP-13 to NIP-16), and found the witness gave false statements about the plaintiff's continuous residence at the disputed property. The court adjourned the case for further cross-examination on 12-02-2026 and indicated the case shall proceed without re-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Court: Civil Judge & J.M.F.C, Sringeri Case: O.S. No. 1/2021 Outcome: The court has rejected the plaintiff's testimony as unreliable and found it to be false. The witness (PW-01) made contradictory statements regarding land construction materials, the shelter scheme allotment, and the plaintiff's residence. The court noted discrepancies between the witness's claims and photographic evidence (NIP-13 to NIP-16), and found the witness gave false statements about the plaintiff's continuous residence at the disputed property. The court adjourned the case for further cross-examination on 12-02-2026 and indicated the case shall proceed without re-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts