Dr.Nataraj R.Rao vs Sri.Sachin Meega — 9/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Under,Section,26,Order,VII,Rule,1. Status: Await orders from HighCourt. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KACM510001832022
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
Filing Number
9/2022
Filing Date
08-04-2022
Registration No
9/2022
Registration Date
08-04-2022
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,NARASIMHARAJAPURA
Judge
1218-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NARASIMHARAJAPURA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dr.Nataraj R.Rao
Adv. Sri.B.Veerendrakumar
Respondent(s)
Sri.Sachin Meega
Hearing History
Judge: 1218-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NARASIMHARAJAPURA
Await orders from HighCourt
Await orders from HighCourt
Await orders from HighCourt
Await orders from HighCourt
Await orders from HighCourt
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Await orders from HighCourt |
| 06-02-2026 | Await orders from HighCourt |
| 09-01-2026 | Await orders from HighCourt |
| 12-12-2025 | Await orders from HighCourt |
| 22-11-2025 | Await orders from HighCourt |
Interim Orders
Summary: The defendant's application (I.A. No.XIX) under Section 138 of the Indian Evidence Act to correct his deposition testimony was rejected. The court found that the defendant's claim of a typographical error (where his answer "No" was recorded as "Yes" regarding receipt of Rs.15,00,000 advance and execution of a written agreement) was an afterthought attempt to withdraw a deliberate and conscious admission made in open court. Since the deposition was typed in the presence of both counsels and the witness, and the defendant signed it without objection, the court rejected the application with no order for costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The defendant's application (I.A. No.XIX) under Section 138 of the Indian Evidence Act to correct his deposition testimony was rejected. The court found that the defendant's claim of a typographical error (where his answer "No" was recorded as "Yes" regarding receipt of Rs.15,00,000 advance and execution of a written agreement) was an afterthought attempt to withdraw a deliberate and conscious admission made in open court. Since the deposition was typed in the presence of both counsels and the witness, and the defendant signed it without objection, the court rejected the application with no order for costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts